7 psi is irrelevant with good second stages
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Maybe PFA or similar. The bigger problem is maintaining reg IP balance from full to empty tank. Sealing to the ID of the piston shaft would allow you to direct HP gas almost parallel to the bore. But the decreased ID compared with the shaft diameter would completely screw balancing.
You'd have to do differential sizing of the tip compared with the shaft. Sort of an extreme version of this:
View attachment 872908
only much bigger tip. That way, the tip ID could match the shaft OD.
But to do that, you'd have to do what Sherwood does with the SR2 and assemble the piston from both sides: UNscrew the shaft with fat tip from the ambient chamber into the piston head.
View attachment 872910
Workable, but techs could easily screw it up.
And the computerized milling to change the HP gas pathway might get a little tricky.
I'm just dreamin'.
I’d be curious if any of the MK11 variants have better IP consistency throughout the supply range. The one MK11 that I worked on some years back rose almost 10PSI from 3K to 500 PSI. Not exactly a balanced 1st stage if you ask me.
Here's a crude drawing...When I read your earlier post I thought that you were talking about something like a balanced version of a MK2 but with a through piston flow path. I’m confused
Are you a gynaecologist Rob
It’s the same seat/poppet/balance chamber arrangement so that doesn’t surprise me.Ditto MK17 IME. I had I've IIRC that had a 15psi swing (?) not positive on that number but it was high, I was surprised.