Arnaud
Contributor
As often, there are 2 levels to consider. One is regarding the legality, the other is the morality. In this case, the legal question is (or was) whether the individual is protected by the NY's Human Rights Law. The moral question is whether he should be protected by the HRL or the First Amendment. A follow-up question is to which extent this would affect private property.
PK, no matter what is going on, I am an optimistic. I strongly believe that the First Amendment is still going strong and that a lot of people are standing to defend free speech. It is however critical not to take it for granted. The mob mentality is not anything new, neither in the States or anywhere else. And it can work either way...
PK, no matter what is going on, I am an optimistic. I strongly believe that the First Amendment is still going strong and that a lot of people are standing to defend free speech. It is however critical not to take it for granted. The mob mentality is not anything new, neither in the States or anywhere else. And it can work either way...