Lake Travis

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

PvilleStang:
Get out the shovel and dynomite...

Now wait a minute dynomite!!!:no :14:
 
LVX:
Anyone have any idea where in the lake you can get 251 even when the lake is at 681?

Bluebonnet Hole ;)

By my reckoning the river channel at Windy Point is 165' deep when the lake is full (681) Might be a little deeper at the base of the dam (maybe 180??)
 
I've heard from several people who've dove Bluebonnet Hole that it bottoms out at 90. I've even got a contour map with it on there and it doesn't show deeper than 80ish in that area.
 
LVX:
Still don't see the historical importance... I agree it makes for better diving - Bluebonnet Hole, Tom Hughs, Starnes Island, Shaker Plant, etc....

Because recent diving history is the history that matters most to me, and that history has been sorely lacking in boat diving travis area due to lack of ramps in the water ;)

If you don't consider diving stuff important, historically or otherwise, maybe you're on the wrong board? :D

Currently the depth of Travis has more significance in my life than most other things the news shows seem to consider significant.
 
Good Lake Travis Info

http://www.arlut.utexas.edu/omg/weather.html

ltts_profplot.ppm.gif
 

Back
Top Bottom