I don't understand the first sentence.
My first sentence was, "My Build checklist occurs after the tanks and scrubber cover are on."
I was responding to where you said earlier:
4) You have your own SOP to build the unit. Paul Raymaeker wrote a build list for a reason.
This statement implies that Paul has a list to follow that dictates that the scrubber cover should be installed before the cylinders are attached.
I have the latest engraved checklist cards from rEvo. There is a Build checklist and a Pre-jump checklist. The Build checklist does not specify the order that the scrubber cover and cylinders are installed. The Build checklist is one that you go through after the scrubber cover and cylinders are installed.
That is what my sentence meant.
I don't know what list you are referring to that Paul Raymaeker has made that specifies that the scrubber cover should be installed before the cylinders are attached. My training only included the 2 checklists that I do follow (at least, as best I can recall). Do you possibly have a link to the list you are talking about?
I meant that the wet matable cable is much more reliable than a Fisher connection, and that the on chip digitization of the signal would exclude that the cable was responsible, so a priori you should have concluded that something inside the canister (chip, or most likely cells) was acting up. What I don't understand then, is how you could hope that some would reliably and durably provide trustworthy information.
When I started getting wonky sensor readings, I recognized them as a sign of (most likely) moisture in the sensors. I have had that before. In the past, it has generally only been 1 sensor, though. I have said it before and I'll repeat it here. I never suspected an actual flood (versus high humidity) that was messing with the sensors. That was my own inexperience and a good lesson learned. In my mind, it passed a negative test done that morning, before getting on the boat. And, I was not hearing ANY gurgling in the loop - which I have had many times in the past when I get a relatively small amount of moisture in the loop. Now I know. Even a flood (versus normal humidity/condensation) in the inhale lung will not result in gurgling.
If 5 sensors are reading 1.3ppO2 and then suddenly 3 of them start reading 0.5 or 2.5, and 2 of them continue to read 1.3, I take that as a strong indicator that the 2 showing 1.3 are correct. ppO2 doesn't change from 1.3 to 0.5 or 2.5 in a sudden, abrupt fashion. Being at 20' and flushing with O2, then seeing the sensors go up to 1.5-ish, then gradually come down again is further confirmation that those 2 sensors were still reading correctly. Particularly when those 2 sensors are connected via an analog connection, straight to the NERD, with no splitters or other devices connected (to those 2 sensors).
I don't understand how you can seem to know rEvos so well and not understand that.
