AfterDark
Contributor
True. However, that does not mean they are safe, that your insurance company won't deny claims, or you have any defense if you get sued when one fails.
An insurance company deny a claim!?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
True. However, that does not mean they are safe, that your insurance company won't deny claims, or you have any defense if you get sued when one fails.
But why buy 6000 psi bottles? They hold less gas than 4500 psi bottles ( at 4500 psi). $800 each or for 4?
and, get them star stamped. Boom! 10 year hydro.
But why buy 6000 psi bottles? They hold less gas than 4500 psi bottles ( at 4500 psi). $800 each or for 4?
and, get them star stamped. Boom! 10 year hydro.
Yup, your math and my math are quite close. 4500# cylinders hold 444 ft3, and 6000# cylinders at 4500# holds 415 ft3.what math are you using for that? Remember that Z-factor is significant at 6000psi at 1.2 vs 1.11 at 4500psi. Last I checked they were the same form factor as the 4500psi bottles so will hold roughly the same amount of gas. 510.5cf @6000->@4500=382.875*1.2/1.11=414cf, so that's close enough to the 444 that the 4500psi's are rated at and factors in the thicker walls
Yup, your math and my math are quite close. 4500# cylinders hold 444 ft3, and 6000# cylinders at 4500# holds 415 ft3.
It’s a smoking deal.That's pretty close. It was a fairly good deal (at least I think), and I can always go a little higher than 4500.
Thoughts?
I was always under the impression hydro testing is required only for transportation. As far as I know if the tank stays in one place you can do what you want.
I think for those us that fill our own tanks...
I tried to bring up the same subject but was blocked from doing so. I'm glad you brought it to the fore. I think the scuba industry needs to move forward and use QR-coded labels or stickers. Relevant information: previous owner, present owner, in test, work history can be documented on a national scale by simply using an iPhone. There is conflicting information on safety since employees’ have a right to work in a safe environment per se; a recognized hazard would be to purposely hit a tank with a hammer.Is it required that bank cylinders that are immobile be hydro tested every five years?
A hammer test is a required test when filling cylinders in the United States that are allowed a 10 year hydro.I tried to bring up the same subject but was blocked from doing so. I'm glad you brought it to the fore. I think the scuba industry needs to move forward and use QR-coded labels or stickers. Relevant information: previous owner, present owner, in test, work history can be documented on a national scale by simply using an iPhone. There is conflicting information on safety since employees’ have a right to work in a safe environment per se; a recognized hazard would be to purposely hit a tank with a hammer.
Provide a link to validate your assumptions.A hammer test is a required test when filling cylinders in the United States that are allowed a 10 year hydro.
I invite you to sit back and learn something. It involves listening and shutting your pie hole.