Is there a current Sheck Exley?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

sheck exley did some things that are just incredible. the dive he did in downstream chip's hole just blows my mind

He also did some pretty crazy things in his early days too...

But I tend to agree with the earlier poster that said it's going to be very difficult for there to be another Sheck because of the adavncements (many of which driven by Sheck himself) made since his time
 
Chasing EOL has gotten a lot more difficult these days. You're just not going to have easy cave, it's either small, very deep, or low viz (sometimes a combination of the three). Sheck took years to develop what we consider an easy training dive these days. Bill R was telling me this weekend how surprised Sheck was when he found out that Bill took his apprentice students on the crossover circuit in Peacock. The grand traverse was a big enough dive to warrant an article written about it, and now is one of the first dives people do out of full cave class (or some, in class). Lamar Hires and Jerry (?) swam to a record 4000ft in Ginnie, which is now a dive you can do with less than 15min of deco.

For instance-- you can get beyond Sheck's Manatee push with a couple of stages and 2 scooters in a single morning and finish the dive not terribly exhausted, but to swim that and set it all up, was HUGE, something that I bet no one has ever done again (nor will anyone). Technology changes our perspective. There hopefully wont ever be another Sheck Exley, although there are several explorers. People are just more quiet about it these days, typically GPS coordinates to sites are given with a firm gag order.
 
Bill R was telling me this weekend how surprised Sheck was when he found out that Bill took his apprentice students on the crossover circuit in Peacock. The grand traverse was a big enough dive to warrant an article written about it, and now is one of the first dives people do out of full cave class (or some, in class). .

Peacock 1 to Olsen used to be a big dive and considered technical.
 
I agree with Curt.

Actually back in Sheck's heydey there were some amazing things occuring by others that didn't get the attention since they didn't publish,and the same thing now. The one incentive Sheck had was he created the CDS after expulsion by the NACD,and to make the CDS viable he published a lot of material where no one else was. I won't take anything away from Sheck,because I know his dive buddies and have heard the stories that never appeared in "Caverns....",but there are a lot of names that have been lost by time that did some incredible things (for example ever wonder who Hendley's castle is named after)
Don Hendley?:idk:
 
Peacock 1 to Olsen used to be a big dive and considered technical.

John Orlowski pointed that out quite a few times in my cave class.

I havent been doing this long enough to have a very valid opinion on the subject. I do think with the advancement of technologies, it makes dives that were very advanced back then, more within reach now, but also makes what was impossible before closer to a possibility now. I found this quote from Sheck today, which I think fits in good with this thread.

“Every field of human endeavor from Tidily Winks to space exploration has its champions and its marks for human endurance and achievement. Without them there would be little or no human progress for we would have nothing to measure our efforts by or encourage us to try harder. It is difficult to imagine any aspect of our lives that is not enhanced by competition, the drive to excel and the recognition of excellence.”

Sheck Exley
 
There is one to follow into the future, that will stop one reel shy.

Agnes Milowka Passion, Daring, Adventure

ABC Online - The Border Watch

March 2, 2011

Melbourne -- The body of a world-renowned cave diver has been recovered from the underwater channels where she was trapped.

Agnes Milowka, 29, ran out of air after becoming separated from her diving companion on Sunday in the eight-kilometre-long channel system of Tank Cave near Mt Gambier, in South Australia's southeast.

Divers recovered the body of the Melbourne diver on Wednesday in what is considered the most complex recovery exercise from a cave system in the history of Australian cave diving.

Police will prepare a report for the coroner in relation to the death of the 29-year-old after her body was recovered around 4pm. Limestone Coast Superintendant Trevor Twilley thanked divers for their effort in the recovery task.

A South East cave diver who has been involved in recovery operations in Australia and the US — and who asked for his name to be withheld — told The Border Watch that the last challenging recoveries of the bodies of cave divers were performed in the 1970s.

“Those recovery exercises were mostly from open sinkholes or caves that are more easily accessible,” he said.

“The recovery of Agnes’ body is the most complex one to be performed in the history of Australian cave diving because of … the spiderweb of tunnels in the cave.”

Since Ms Milowka was reported missing while diving with a partner in Tank Cave on Sunday, highly experienced cave divers from the Cave Divers Association of Australia had used crow bars, water scooters and saws to clear a safe route to bring her body to the surface.

Her body was found in a very narrow “tight spot” in the cave system and it appeared that she attempted to find her way out before she ran out of air.

Supt Twilley said at the cave site on Wednesday morning, prior to completion of the recovery effort, the team of eight divers were making slow progress in recovering her body.

“(Wednesday morning) it took divers 32 minutes to get from the entrance to the location of the body, while before it took them much longer,” he said.

“Although they are quicker to reach the location where Agnes’ body is, visibility and the location are a problem — she’s in a small chamber with jagged edges and solid rock and divers are chiseling the rock and using saws.

“A diver can spend only 12 minutes down there and then has to return and wait for about three hours for the sediment to settle before they can return.”

Supt Twilley said it was planned that at least three divers would bring Agnes’ body to the surface.

“One diver will be in front with a light, another one behind him, then Agnes’ body and then one behind them,” he said.

“Alternative routes have also been worked out so that the person behind Agnes can get out, in case something happens.”

Supt Twilley said police divers — who are restricted by regulations in performing such a recovery — would be called in shortly before the body was brought to the surface.

It is understood that Ms Milowka swam away from her diving buddy to explore a channel in the cave system where there were no guide ropes, which are in the cave system on a permanent basis for divers to use.

According to Supt Twilley, Ms Milowka — like most cave divers — was known for getting a thrill out of exploring parts of caves that have never been explored before.

“That is what cave divers do when they go diving — they explore undiscovered parts of caves and if they didn’t do it, no one would have known that the channels in Tank Cave go for 7km,” he said.

“This is just a very unfortunate thing that happened to someone so young and so well respected in the Australian cave diving fraternity.”

Ms Milowka’s traumatised parents arrived at the scene on Sunday, where they remained until Tuesday before they returned to Melbourne.
“For personal reasons they did not want to be here at the final moment,” Supt Twilley said.

A spokesperson for the cave divers association said an investigation into safety procedures would be undertaken.

He said it had been an extremely emotional period for divers, who were glad the recovery process had been completed.
 
As a former commercial deepsea oilfield diver, I have to wonder if Mr. Exley & others of his ilk ever tapped into the vast reservoir of knowledge & experience of the military / commercial deep diving establishments. The depths he was attempting ( & far beyond, in fact ) were reached many years before, and considerable work was performed. Does anyone know if such attempts were made? Even if they were, I fear those establishments might not share their data, citing it as propriatary information, or, in the case of the military - classified material.

To my knowledge, HPNS came to light in the late 70's/early 80's, as an aspect of extremely deep commercial diving ventures ( beyond 1500 fsw ), and was then studied as part of the hyperbaric research into extending man's deep diving capabilities beyond 2000 fsw. I seem to recall that in the ultra-deep saturation environment, HPNS became an intractable problem, despite extremely slow rates of compression. At those depths, helium density was becoming problematic, and various exotic mixes were experimented with in an attempt to overcome the debillitating effects of HPNS. It is my understanding that this & other issues effectively ended the quest for breathing gases useable beyond 2200 fsw, and efforts to push back the depth threshold for humans was abandonded in favour of the development of autonomous u/w vehicles.

When I read of Mr. Shaw's demise, I again wondered if he had ever sought the advice of the bell bounce / saturation diving community. Having been saturated to a depth of 730 fsw myself, I know something of the extreme fatigue associated with great depth. I would have suggested to him that rather than trying to "bag" the remains of the deceased diver ( something I would deem to be considerable "work" at such depth, particularly when using a rebreather ), he simply snap a clip to the deceased diver's kit, that was attatched to a haul-line to surface. I suspect he may have rejected such a plan as there would be a risk that not all of the remains would make it to surface. Still, it would have significantly reduced effort & time at depth, making the attempt much safer for him.

While not something that compels me personally, I can understand the needs of others to explore & push the boundaries - in this case, the limits of self-contained diving. For all those that follow Mr. Exley, I hope they access every scrap of available knowledge to not only achieve their goals, but to survive to dive another day.

Regards,
DSD
 
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom