SlugLife
Contributor
If not for politics infecting everything, we would be interested in and talking about the pros and cons of various treatments and preventative measures. Politics is the actual deadly disease. I remember in March 2020, that finding information on treatments was damn near impossible. Now days "everyone" takes it for granted that you're not allowed to talk about treatments. I think mentioning Ivermectin can get you banned on YouTube. Don't even bother with a Google search.I won't be forced to roll the dice on the kill shot, directly or indirectly. Mainly because there are effective alternative treatments that have been suppressed by the government health agencies as well as the media. Literally millions of lives could have been saved, if not for the active suppression of these treatments and the one size fits all approach by the criminally negligent CDC and NIH.
Yes, HCQ is one of those effective treatments, regardless of what you were told by the media, who cared more to bash Trump than save lives.
I don't know anything about the Talcum powder case, but we've seen more than a few silly decisions out of lower courts to raise concerns with such decisions.
It sounds absurd, and I thought so too at first. However, apparently there were even internal emails at Johnson and Johnson where they noticed it seemed to be causing cancer. My point of mentioning that, was to point it it's fairly difficult to know what may have medium-to-long term health consequences of relatively mundane items, and that we're much less likely to know for something like an MRNA injection.