CT-Rich
Contributor
The reason I am doing that is you are creating a fanciful narrative that really has no basis in fact. You could say “gee I wonder if the equipment they had fit” or “I wonder if they silted out”. Or “I wonder how the body ended up at 36 m, was it a straight drop or did he go down a slope”. You really can’t take all those supposition and build a complete narrative out of them.CT I’m just trying to piece together what might have happened which might avoid tragedy’s like this happening what is the point in mockingly picking apart what someone has said,
The question before us is whether the shop and instructor/guide acted in a way that significantly contributed to the death of the diver. Ok, the husband was a heavy breather... he had an inadequate tank for the planned dive, who was responsible? The fit of the wetsuit was never mentioned, so it was not necessarily an issue, same with the BCD. We can’t real talk about those being contributing factors because it is not in any of the articles about the dive.
We can talk about how each of these things could have been a contributing factor, but only in isolation. Putting them together is creating a narrative unmoored from reality and doesn’t address the core question of whether or not the Instructor or the shop should be held liable for the resulting death.