Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
if you post some pivtures we may better be able to dtermine if she is fit for diving...
Maybe so, but if this had been a poll, I'd still be in the NO WAY camp. Same answer to cliff climbing, sky diving, any other life threatening activity - and scuba is still that.I assume she is an adult. It's her right to knowingly take risks. It's the right of her potential buddies to know about the risk. Provided she and her buddies are OK with the increased risk, then there's no reason she couldn't/shouldn't dive.
I think cave divers are unecessarily and unduly risking their lives, but I doubt that anyone agrees that just because I think they are crazy that they should be prohibited from risking their lives cave diving. I feel the same way about her diving.
A full face mask and a buddy pair dedicated to watching her would minimize the risk.
Let's recall the original question, which was, "would she get a [medical] approval" to dive? The answer seems to be an unequivocal "no."it is still a risk which would probably disqualify her during the dive medical. Would she be able to get an approval if her equipment mitigated the risks during such a blackout? ie: full face mask.
I'm an HSA instructor- Seizure disorder (Or something producing similar results as in this case) is a contraindication even for them.
HSA opens doors for as many folks as they possibly can- by training both the diver and their buddy how to adapt and overcome. But a situation like this has no safe adaptation- it's putting the persons life at risk.
Unless a way can be found to RELIABLY control the condition it's simply to great of a risk.
Nah, you're fine. For many dive situations, the possibility of also undo risk to others is certainly there - just as it would be if she was driving. We have stiff drunk driver laws not because of the drunks who kill themselves so much as their dangers to others.Sorry if I seemed a bit harsh, I didn't mean to. I'm at work and have distractions...
I was only trying to point out that we as humans have the right to control our own life risks... but not that of others.
And if this seems harsh, sorry in advance but... just like in the gun issue, any accident or incident casts a shadow over the whole. So this question has the possibility of very deep ramifications, not just to (2) lives; but also to our (diving) way of life.
Don't mean to sound so melodramatic but unfortunately that's the way it is, and everyone who is honest knows I'm right.
Ok, fine - but to the original question....?I am also HSA trained, and believe the contraindication for seizure disorders is because of the risk of lung expansion during ascent if the airway is closed. If the potential diver simply falls asleep, that risk is absent.
I stand by my earlier post. While a narcoleptic (or similar) person would not be a reliable buddy, and not likely to be accepted into a standard scuba class, I see no reason why she couldnt dive with properly trained buddies (perhaps two HSA-trained buddies) and a full face mask.
No way...!A great friend of mine wants to learn scuba but she has an occasional medical problem in which once every 1-3 months she will black out for about 30 seconds.
Although the chances of it happening while diving are very slim, it is still a risk which would probably disqualify her during the dive medical. Would she be able to get an approval if her equipment mitigated the risks during such a blackout? ie: full face mask
She doesn't have fits or seizures or stop breathing and just goes limp during the blackouts.