Tommy, I'm very glad things have come out well for you, and thank you so much for posting your story. We rarely have good first-hand information on incidents like this!
The people who have evaluated you have the advantage of a great deal more information than we have. We don't know your age, your general health history, or even your gender (although I'm presuming you're male). We don't know your family history, or whether there are any other things in your history that would raise your risk of seizures. Given the scant information we do have, I think AGE has to be very high in the differential diagnosis -- the time of onset during the dive, on ascent, would not be atypical, and the severity would go along with that diagnosis. But if you are in your 60's, or have high blood pressure, this could be other things (like TIA). I think making a diagnosis in a strange case like this over the internet is fraught with hazard.
That said, if the neurologist also concurs that this was likely AGE, then the big question is why it happened. The profile isn't overly aggressive, but we don't have the ascent profile, just the safety stop information. There was apparently enough current to have to hang onto the acent line; was there enough to cause Valsava maneuvers from exertion?
Testing for a PFO certainly sounds reasonable, but if one is found, you have a difficult decision to make. As the correlation between PFO and DCS is far from perfect, you may elect to stop diving when it isn't required. On the other hand, if you do have a PFO and elect to have it closed, you don't know that this will absolutely prevent another event. It's a good idea to think over what you would want to do, or can do, if you have the test, because you will have to make decisions once it is done.