I was replying to scubadada's comment about the PZ+ algorithm.It had some kind of glitch in the circuit that drained the battery in two weeks, but AL took care of it. Good company.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I was replying to scubadada's comment about the PZ+ algorithm.It had some kind of glitch in the circuit that drained the battery in two weeks, but AL took care of it. Good company.
No, to each their own, a personal decision. I choose to dive DSAT, you choose to dive PZ+Wow, you say this like there is some serious problem with it!
I've been using it for about 1000 dives on my OC1. No issues.
I dived DSAT a long time on my OC1, moved to PZ+ when I started using a Shearwater as a primary.No, to each their own, a personal decision. I choose to dive DSAT, you choose to dive PZ+
Why did you switch? You can reasonably match DSAT with Buhlmann and GF once you figure out how it works. PZ+ is just so much more conservative.I dived DSAT a long time on my OC1, moved to PZ+ when I started using a Shearwater as a primary.
I'm old. Conservative is good. In diving, that is.Why did you switch? You can reasonably match DSAT with Buhlmann and GF once you figure out how it works. PZ+ is just so much more conservative.
Good answerI'm old. Conservative is good. In diving, that is.
I wanted to pick the GFs first, and work from there.
I'm considering an i450T as a backup to my i550. From what I've read here a good, but expensive option when the transmitter cost is factored in. Has anyone experienced any issues? I use the pay version of Diverlog and admit, it's wanting, but aside from the logging software any issues with pairing, losing pairing, other faults?