Rainer
Contributor
David Watson:DIR config for OW? Where are you getting this from? Swivels are NOT DIR!
David
Wow, a bit new to DIR are we?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
David Watson:DIR config for OW? Where are you getting this from? Swivels are NOT DIR!
David
David Watson:DIR config for OW? Where are you getting this from? Swivels are NOT DIR!
David
Rainer:Just checked the standards, and a long hose is STILL not required by GUE:
Long Hose: Optional in shallow, open water diving, but mandatory in deeper or overhead diving; the long hose simplifies air sharing. When used, the long hose, along with the primary regulator, should ALWAYS be placed on the diver's right post.
That said, my GUE teammates and I all use 7' hoses. The OP has no interest in doing such. A 40" hose is a good compromise, as it still allows for the primary to be donated with the secondary bungeed. In non-overhead environments, this offers a lot of benefits over a more "standard" rec setup (i.e. give "octo").
Rainer:Have you actually ever tried a 40" hose without a swivel? Puts the reg in a very awkward position. Most divers (DIR included) add a swivel if they use this config (note "if"). Just add one with NO known failures (e.g. Atomic or KM). Come on now, I know you've only gone through GUE-F, but they did teach you to be a thinking diver, no?
Carribeandiver:I kept the backup reg on the necklace but changed my primary reg back to the normal hose. I thought it over and the long hose did not seem necessary in open water diving.
I still am using the SPG and depth gauge/Bottom timer and non-split fins. Although, I may go back to my SmartCom, not sure at the moment.
Rainer:Have you actually ever tried a 40" hose without a swivel? Puts the reg in a very awkward position. Most divers (DIR included) add a swivel if they use this config (note "if"). Just add one with NO known failures (e.g. Atomic or KM). Come on now, I know you've only gone through GUE-F, but they did teach you to be a thinking diver, no?
you missed the point of the post. the first line reads it is not to criticize DIR and the thread is legion with praise for those that dive DIR. I just said, it was not for me.David Watson:As for the OP, maybe you should have given people the full story before sand bagging our philosophy. Obviously you never gave it a chance.
David