The class is there to introduce you to techniques, theory, planning considerations, and beat you down a little in terms of challenging you with task loading so that you understand these things take time to master.
I guess this depends on teaching style of the instructor and the learning style /motivation of the student.
The real job of the instructor is to provide what the student can't do for themselves:
1. Demonstrate and display optimal role-modelling attitude, skills, protocols and procedures for the student to see and learn.
2. Observe and correct student performance, to firstly permit acquisition and later allow application under increasingly elevated levels of demand.
3. To assess student performance and give detailed remedial feedback on that. This both aids skill /protocol refinement and also provides the student with an overall benchmark of the competency (
see earlier post on psychological issues with assessing your own competency).
The instructor is there to make the diver better. Many (
but a reducing number sadly) divers prepare themselves for technical training through theory research and fundamental skills practice.
If the instructor were only to "introduce" things, then they'd be potentially under-teaching. The instructor should raise the student as high as training duration allows.
Obviously, there's a benchmark competency that defines certification level, interpreted by the agencies'
and instructor's standards, and the instructor has to provide assessment to ensure that the student meets or... ideally... exceeds that.
If you're not practicing these techniques outside of the training environment, you're doing it wrong. If you're going from class to class without cementing the skills and truly understanding the theory and principles you learned in the previous one, you're doing it wrong. The only way to master the things you learn is by diving, practicing, and thinking.
Understood and agreed. I'd merely point out a difference between doing '
diving' and doing '
dedicated practice'.
Simplistically stacking up the numbers in your dive log isn't an efficient way to develop skills and ability. You need to commit to dedicated, focused practice work...with feedback... to see tangible results per session.
Feedback and corrective steps is what the diver needs help with. An instructor... or if available, a mentor with expertise... is invaluable for this.
As the quote goes: "
Practice doesn't make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect".
It's the instructor who ensures the diver is doing 'perfect practice'. The student is ready to continue alone only once they have perfect skills to practice.
As an example:
I had a technical student for 3 weeks of training in Oct/Nov. We completed over 40 hours in-water... averaging 2-3 hours a day. Few people can sustain more than that when doing intensive, focused practice. Most of that training was shallow skills work.
Only when skills were cemented did we seek to apply them on assessed dives. The assessed dives highlighted new areas for practice that formed the basis of further shallow training. For instance, when he struggled to shoot a DSMB on an application dive, our next step was to spend a focused hour practicing only DSMB deployment, using a spectrum of drills - until he could do it reliably in under 40 seconds, without any degredation to his fundamentals and situational awareness.
The development was staggering... and the diver (
who first arrived with only 44 logged dives) finished training with a very high level of skill...and a low level of stress in check-out dives. The training delivered in reasonably 'finished product' in a very short timescale.
The next student, a qualified dive instructor with hundreds of dives, was much more limited in available training time. We had only 5 days for training...reflecting 'only' ~10 hours in-water. Whilst that student did achieve the necessary standard for certification, there was clearly still vast requirement for further practice time... and this was illustrated by the persisting level of stress and task loading on his checkout dives. The training ensured basic safe competency at entry-level tech, but wasn't a 'finished product'... the student had a 'route map' for future development. But that development will demand hundreds of hours of self-guided practice and problem-solving to identify and remedy performance deficits.
For the same reasons, this is why programmes like the GUE Fundamentals achieve effective results. They set a standard to be achieved and commit significant in-water training time to dedicated skills/protocol practice. The feedback given in-water and post-dive is critical to timely and effective improvement.
In short...what gets efficient results is hours of hard work doing unglamorous diving, with detailed and timely performance assessment against stringent standards.
This provides the baseline ability from which you go out and do dives to apply those skills and gain experience.
Too many divers focus on trying to apply skills that aren't yet a reliable baseline. Running before they can walk.
In my view, (technical) divers have a personal responsibility for their own development, knowledge, and skill. The instructor is there to guide you on your journey. It is your responsibility to make yourself a skillful, competent, and capable diver. Your instructor can help you learn techniques and avoid pitfalls that would be costly or fatal for you to learn on your own.
I concur. The article I wrote (
linked in earlier post) describes the concept of taking 10,000 of
dedicated practice to reach a level of expertise.
The instructor is the pre-cursor to that practice. They must teach skills and protocols 'perfectly' so that the student can continue to ingrain them 'perfectly' thereafter. They must shape the correct mindset. They must teach theory appropriate to the diver's needs (
typically well expanded beyond the contents of a textbook)... and they must have the expertise to effectively critique and resolve student performance deficiencies
(be a great teacher and coach).
Most importantly, the tech instructor must ensure that the student has a baseline competence, safety and correct mindset, before issuing certification that exposes the student to diving at levels where there is significant risk, high physical and psychological demand... and is typically very unforgiving of single errors.
Mindset is critical because tech divers who are content to '
learn from their mistakes' on actual dives probably shouldn't expect a long lifespan.