- Messages
- 20,644
- Reaction score
- 15,136
- # of dives
- I'm a Fish!
only 3200? You're being far to gentle with them...
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I want to start by saying I do not want this thread to become a debate over AL vs steel tanks or about training.
Currently I have 2 AL80 tanks and they have met my need. However, I'm going to start doing nitrox diving to and looking at adding stage bottles. I know to do nitrox I'm going to dedicate tanks to nitrox (under 40%). I have a plan to get to doubles with 2 stage tanks when I finish my Tec training. But want to buy smart on my way to that goal.
I was thinking of getting 2 larger tanks (110) to dedicate to nitrox will give me more bottom time on 60-90 ft dives, and in the future they could become a twin set. Then add 2 stage bottles, then add 2 more 110s convert to twins then add 2 more stage bottles.
What I was thinking...
2 AL 80 - air (already own)
2 ST 78 - nitrox stage (will need 4 for 2 dive charter)
4 ST 110 - 2 twin sets nitrox
By the time you've spent a fortune on stages and doubles it will be time to realize you've spent way more than a rebreather costs.
If you check it out, you really have not gained anything by pumping this tank, except for over stressing it. The cubic volume difference between your LP85 and a HP100 is .1 liters. The HP tank is made to take the pressure at 3442 psi on a regular basis. The LP tank is not and if you look at the weights of the tanks you will see a slight difference in empty weight. Another point being, did you change the valve to accept the higher operating pressure you are subjecting it to. I know, all minor things, but in this day and age, points that are looked at in an accident or event that went wrong.I've started to use LP Faber 85's for deep dives in the 170-200 range and I have more than enough. I like them more than the my doubled Faber 100s and PST 100's. Plus I pump them up to 3200 also.
No debate, but check the specs on faber LP 85's. They are 13 liter volume. HP 120's are 15 liter volume. HP 100's are 12.9 liter.I was hoping not to get into a LP vs HP discussion, but valves are valves, all modern valves are designed to take high pressure, if he's going that high which really isn't that high, it's only the burst discs that have to be replaced. When have you ever seen valves with different pressure ratings on them that were made in the last 20 years aside from the 7/8" necks?
LP85's are more analogous to HP120's than they are to HP100's, holding right around 113cf at 3500psi, the Worthington 85's are closer to HP100 specs, Fabers are not, and you'll note that among the Worthington tank specs, the LP85 splits the capacity of the 100 and 120's, and also splits the weight between them almost exactly. Same damn tanks. Too expensive to do otherwise, at least for that run. Faber has recently redesigned the alloy for all of their tanks, and they have all gotten a bit lighter and they all float like hell now. Oh, the Worthington 119 and LP95 are basically identical, the 119 is .2 inches longer and .1lbs heavier. If that isn't the same damned tank I don't know what is.
LP tanks especially the more modern 2400+ bottles have been subjected to multiple hydro's a week for decades and there has yet to be a documented tank failure, and I don't know of any LP bottles that have failed hydro, only VIP due to rust. Stop spreading that crap, if you want to pump your LP tanks all the way up, go for it, they aren't going to explode on you, just make sure the burst discs are at the right rating and you'll be fine.