Activating a PLB causes a significant chain of events to start, lacking an emergency on the surface, isn't it prudent to give some grace before calling in the calvary?
I get that, but the events are not just a full out SAR response on an activation.
First, the CG will try to ascertain if it is an actual emergency. They are aware that false alarms do exist. So, they'll call the contact information associated with the beacon registration. They'll start with the owner, then if unable to reach, go to emergency contacts. So, as long as you make sure you know who you listed as your emergency contacts and they are aware of what you are doing, then I think the chain of events can result in an appropriate response. Something like this:
PLB activated --> Authorities receive the signal and access the registration --> Contact owner --> Contact Emergency contact --> Emergency contact provides details of the charter that you are on --> CG contacts charter.
All of that can happen without sending a plane or helicopter out to search. If they are able to contact the charter, they can relay the position and send the boat in your direction. All without deploying CG assets in the field.
Depending on the location, floating on the surface with no boat in sight, when there clearly should have been one could be an emergency. If shore is a short swim away, then perhaps not. But where I dive, a swim to shore is going to take many hours ignoring fatigue and current. That is an emergency.
I do agree, though. If you have other means of communication, try those first. That goes for if you are in the water, or on a boat. If all you have is a PLB and you were expecting a boat to be there when you surfaced, then use it.