OR ... just dive air and decompress as necessary.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Can someone do the math of how many EAN40 tanks would be required to provide AL80 (77cu ft) EAN32 for let's say 'just' 12 divers over the course of 5+ days of 4 dive per day diving? Seems like a lot....
Can someone do the math of how many EAN40 tanks would be required to provide AL80 (77cu ft) EAN32 for let's say 'just' 12 divers over the course of 5+ days of 4 dive per day diving? Seems like a lot....
Anything over 40% will have the same rules as O2, and for a good reason. As I understand it, NASAs research after the disastrous fire that killed three astronauts indicated that the dangers of handling O2 were pretty much the same from 50%-100%.If they like the idea I would actually propose a higher mix - basically as high as a Bali op would mix for them as long as it's not pure O2 (if they agree to pure O2 even better although I think they will not). I guess I should put a gas blending cert on my to do list for the future - could come in handy. Are there limits to how high a % one could mix?
Anything over 40% will have the same rules as O2, and for a good reason. As I understand it, NASAs research after the disastrous fire that killed three astronauts indicated that the dangers of handling O2 were pretty much the same from 50%-100%.
I have only been on 4 liveaboards, but as I think back on them, I can't think of any that would have room for a bunch of 300 cubic foot tanks of EANx 40. It is also a surprisingly expensive solution, believe me. It would be a lot cheaper for the company to do what it takes to fix the present system, and they apparently don't want to spend that kind of money.
Anything over 40% will have the same rules as O2, and for a good reason.
I have only been on 4 liveaboards, but as I think back on them, I can't think of any that would have room for a bunch of 300 cubic foot tanks of EANx 40. It is also a surprisingly expensive solution, believe me. It would be a lot cheaper for the company to do what it takes to fix the present system, and they apparently don't want to spend that kind of money.
rough calculation off the top of my head
5 days, 12 divers 4 dives per day is 240 tank fills, less say 20 tanks that you would leave port with full of EAN32 is 220 tank fills
roughly have to mix EAN40 with air half and half to get EAN32, figure each tank has about 500psi in it, so 60ft3 fill, 30ft3 of which is EAN40.
so, 1 300ft3 supply tank is good for 10 fills, and 22 would be needed (along with a booster), after that everyone is diving air.
so yes, its a lot, unless refilling the supply tanks over the course of the trip is possible.
You're assuming that the booster can suck the supply bottle dry and that the boat's compressor has the capacity to both boost gas AND perform top ups in the short surface interval period for n divers. Depending on the size of the compressor you may put stress on the system, empty the banks or both.
If it were my boat, I'd apologize for the inconvenience, make a good faith attempt to get the system fixed and failing that, tell you to just dive air. Having a crew busy themselves with bandaid nitrox solutions, inefficient blending strategies, etc. distracts from their already busy day and deviates from the routine of the boat.
Really not feasible without using a smaller bank and stopping along the way somewhere to have the bank refilled, and if that is the case, may as well just put EAN32 in the bank.