Good correction, thanks!Not quite right. If the diameter is 8" at the surface, at 10m/33ft the volume will halve, not the diameter. So when the pressure doubles, the diameter will actually be 6.35" (Using for the formula (4/3) × π × r³)
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Good correction, thanks!Not quite right. If the diameter is 8" at the surface, at 10m/33ft the volume will halve, not the diameter. So when the pressure doubles, the diameter will actually be 6.35" (Using for the formula (4/3) × π × r³)
Sorry to say, and Tracy is correctWhich argument
Let me restate my initial argument using a visual aid.
View attachment 808882
In the right bottom corner of each body of water is a depth gauge. One is labeled x, the other y.
My argument is that x will show a shallower depth than y.
Edit: I should note that the "roof" of the x chamber is magically self-supporting in this scenario and so adds no pressure to the water below it.
Great video! That really helped make sense of why it doesn‘t relate to the weight of the water.Here's a YouTube video will explains reasonably well.
The mind-bending concept here comes about when trying to apply the physics of a solid to a fluid. If you have an oddly shaped solid object, the entire mass of the object is concentrated on the surface on which it is resting.
With fluids, there is an additional dimension of pressure - the pressure keeping the fluid in the container, which is exerted on the sides of the container. And the in the narrow pipe scenario, the ceiling of the large chamber is what exerts the pressure against the water, which is needed to keep it in the container.
Well OK, so, under your hypothesis here, where and and at what rate exactly does this pressure drop happen? Instantaneously the moment the pressure gauge moves below the level of the roof? Or gradually - in which case how far do you have to move the gauge for the drop to occur? Would it start to drop before you have even left the tube? Or not?That is a very interesting question. My hypothesis is that the pressure would drop to just a bit more than 1 atmosphere as you moved the gauge just under the "roof".
Which argument
Let me restate my initial argument using a visual aid.
View attachment 808882
In the right bottom corner of each body of water is a depth gauge. One is labeled x, the other y.
My argument is that x will show a shallower depth than y.
Edit: I should note that the "roof" of the x chamber is magically self-supporting in this scenario and so adds no pressure to the water below it.
There is gotta be a cutt-off point though. If the tube on the first container is only the diameter of a tiny straw or smaller you would see a lower pressure, I reckon. I don't think the downtube can be infinitely small. Is there a cut-off point when is comes to diameter of the downtube, @Angelo Farina?I could mock it all up, but I can save you the hassle and just tell you the depth gauges will read the same in that drawing.
I guess this would go a long way towards answering that question:There is gotta be a cutt-off point though. If the tube on the first container is only the diameter of a tiny straw or smaller you would see a lower pressure, I reckon. I don't think the downtube can be infinitely small. Is there a cut-off point when is comes to diameter of the downtube, @Angelo Farina?
Aside from that, if I understand what I've learned in this thread, the relation between the sizes otherwise will not matter. You can have the whole Atlantic connected to a thin pipe and the physics would be the same.For the sake of severely complicating things unnecessarily, at some point the "vertical tube" could be thin enough that that capillary effects would be a consideration...
Capillary Action and Water | U.S. Geological Survey
Plants and trees couldn't thrive without capillary action. Capillary action helps bring water up into the roots. With the help of adhesion and cohesion, water can work its way all the way up to the branches and leaves. Read on to learn more about how this movement of water takes place.www.usgs.gov
There is gotta be a cutt-off point though. If the tube on the first container is only the diameter of a tiny straw or smaller you would see a lower pressure, I reckon. I don't think the downtube can be infinitely small. Is there a cut-off point when is comes to diameter of the downtube, @Angelo Farina?
For the sake of severely complicating things unnecessarily, at some point the "vertical tube" could be thin enough that that capillary effects would be a consideration...
Capillary Action and Water | U.S. Geological Survey
Plants and trees couldn't thrive without capillary action. Capillary action helps bring water up into the roots. With the help of adhesion and cohesion, water can work its way all the way up to the branches and leaves. Read on to learn more about how this movement of water takes place.www.usgs.gov