I haven't met too many divers who I thought were normal sized adults with the air-consumption of dwarf hamsters but Lynne, in addition to all of her other amazing qualities, is certainly one of them.
And my friend Ben Martinez (Ben M here) who is 6 feet tall, makes me look like an air hog . . .
I really do think that, after the initial drop in air consumption that occurs when diving stops being an overwhelming experience, that all the improvement you can make in gas consumption after that comes from minimizing the amount you move. And it gets into little tiny differences -- for example, I discovered that, when I frog kicked, I stiffened my ankles in the loading phase, which was causing a degree of braking. I got rid of that, and I kick less often for the same swimming speed, so that reduced my gas consumption. In my recent sidemount class with Natalie Gibb, she didn't like how far apart my knees got during the loading phase, so I'm working on correcting that to become even a bit MORE efficient. (Efficiency is a passion for cave divers, because your dive is limited by your gas supply, so if you can get better with that, you get more cave time.
) My instructor, Danny Riordan, is simply the quietest person in the water I've ever seen (I call him "negative space in the water"). He simply doesn't move unless that movement serves a purpose. I think very few of us reach that degree of stillness.
Slow, rhythmic breathing is important, but it almost COMES with that degree of ability to be motionless. I mean, if you aren't kicking or moving your hands, and you're panting like a dog, you'll notice it.
BTW, lung size has nothing to do with gas consumption, except that larger lungs are generally found in larger people, and more body mass usually means more CO2 production and a higher respiratory minute volume. I don't know where the idea that big lungs make for gas hogs came from, but it's completely spurious.