jonnythan:
Ugh. The Toshiba player is a total POS. The Samsung Blu-Ray is apparently not *as* bad.
I think either technology clearly has sufficient technical muscle to succeed. The differences between the two are in reality exceedingly small. Both support lossless surround sound, VC-1, 25-30GB of disk space.
I don't care which one wins, as long as one does. The winner *will* be determined by marketing, not the marketplace.
I'd *love* to hear the argument for Blu-Ray being technologically inferior, though.
Jon -
Have you actually seen the Toshiba in action? Granted it's slow-ish (it's basically a PC for chrissakes, it takes time to boot up
), but overall, the quality is there. I haven't seen the Samsung yet as our Best Buy is clueless and refuses to put it out even though every other one in the country already has.
BD does allow for the support of VC1, but the initial titles are being released using MPEG-2 on 25GB discs. That is where the technologically inferior comes in. Sony is so enamored with themselves that they are releasing the first salvo (pun intended) of movies on smaller discs, using a codec that is not able to handle the rigors of HD content given the confined space and bitrates needed.
The Fifth Element was supposed to be a watershed/reference/home-run disc for the BD format, and pretty much everyone from A/V n00b to industry pro has stated that TFE is an absolutely horrid transfer, and as of right now, BD titles are pretty much a failure.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not anti-BD. I'm anti-Sony's arrogance. Rather than play nice, they've chosen the route that allows them to control every step of the proccess. But then again, this is Sony's modus operandi...Release a crappy version of movies, then turn around a year later and release a "Special edition", and then another year later release a "Super-duper stuff we should have given you the first time around Superbit edition"
Feel free to come over anytime, I'll fire up the HD-A1 and make you a believer. I guarantee it would look fabulous on the Maxent. :14: