Chilly,
Your moderation is too heavy handed and one sided.
Re-read the thread.
The nastiness originated with the OP after several instructors pointed out in a reasonable manner that the situation didn’t comport with standards.
Tell me what was wrong with the way I presented the matter, in which I was careful to say I might be misunderstanding the situation but wanted to advise him of the risks.
Even when he replied rudely to that, I offered a conciliatory reminder that our criticism was aimed at his instructor, not him.
He then escalated.
We asked for clarification. He accused us of jumping to conclusions, said he couldn’t be bothered to clarify his position, and then acted all superior to instructors everywhere because he tutored one candidate.
Yes, I replied with sarcasm, which his arrogant, thin-skinned attitude richly called for.
I resent that you deleted my post and let all his BS stand.
But if you want to retain new members like him by antagonizing the supporting members, that’s your choice.
Your moderation is too heavy handed and one sided.
Re-read the thread.
The nastiness originated with the OP after several instructors pointed out in a reasonable manner that the situation didn’t comport with standards.
Tell me what was wrong with the way I presented the matter, in which I was careful to say I might be misunderstanding the situation but wanted to advise him of the risks.
Even when he replied rudely to that, I offered a conciliatory reminder that our criticism was aimed at his instructor, not him.
He then escalated.
We asked for clarification. He accused us of jumping to conclusions, said he couldn’t be bothered to clarify his position, and then acted all superior to instructors everywhere because he tutored one candidate.
Yes, I replied with sarcasm, which his arrogant, thin-skinned attitude richly called for.
I resent that you deleted my post and let all his BS stand.
But if you want to retain new members like him by antagonizing the supporting members, that’s your choice.