What you're describing sounds more like UTD than GUE, so I just wanted to clarify so it doesn't give a wrong impression. I just finished GUE T1, and we planned all our dives with the DecoPlanner software. It is true that during the class we set our computers to gauge mode to practice keeping track of bottom time, average depth and memorizing our deco shedules (which we also had written down in our wetnotes). We also had plans for shorter/longer, shallower/deeper dives. This was done to increase awareness and mental capacity, and to show we can use the computer as a tool instead of following it blindly. However, we also discussed the benefits of using computers, and how to use them for tech dives. We did not do a lot of calculation in our heads, other than keeping track of bottom time and guesstimating average depth (which we could verify on the computer). By taking time in the planning phase to look at different profiles and their deco, we were taught to look for simple mathematical relationships we could use to adjust the plan in a pinch, but that was not the primary way we planned or executed dives.
In short, I'd say that GUE emphasizes planning and being aware of how changes in the dive plan affects your deco schedule, while using the computer as a tool for added safety. And being more aware of the dive profiles and how they affect deco, helps you maked informed decisions to adjust the exposure to the individual diver and the team. Also standard gases makes planning and executing tech dives a lot easier, and gives familiarity with typical profiles and deco schedules. So: Plan the dive, and dive the plan - BUT know how and when to adjust the plan if needed.