Potapko
Contributor
First of all, I did the search Couldn't find anything.
There are a hundred threads about ditchable weight vs non-ditchable. Every one of them deals with the issue of swimming the rig up in the case of the loss of boyancy but none of them (that I found) deal with the possibility of having to remove the rig at depth. In a drysuit especially, or even wet for that matter, if you have a need to remove the rig (such as the case of entanglement) and you are not wearing the weight independent from it, aren't you in a bit of trouble?
I dive single hp120's and a drysuit with a 6lb plate. I use an additional 12 lbs in halcyon style pockets. Recently I have been considering going back to a belt for this very reason. If I remove the rig I cannot maintain depth.
Does "Doing It Right" include planning for this possibility?
Thanks in advance,
There are a hundred threads about ditchable weight vs non-ditchable. Every one of them deals with the issue of swimming the rig up in the case of the loss of boyancy but none of them (that I found) deal with the possibility of having to remove the rig at depth. In a drysuit especially, or even wet for that matter, if you have a need to remove the rig (such as the case of entanglement) and you are not wearing the weight independent from it, aren't you in a bit of trouble?
I dive single hp120's and a drysuit with a 6lb plate. I use an additional 12 lbs in halcyon style pockets. Recently I have been considering going back to a belt for this very reason. If I remove the rig I cannot maintain depth.
Does "Doing It Right" include planning for this possibility?
Thanks in advance,