Bill,
The real issue for what you are discussing, is how much control surface is on the fin for precise control, and "How effectively" the control surface works -- how "tight" is the steering
.... and for Frog kick, the 2 main things that are critical is that the fin is a stiff enough platform to PUSH on, along with allowing easy ankle articulation so that you can roll the blade after the push, and slide it back to the start phase without resistance.
( the push is like you are climbing a ladder, and pulled your legs up to 2 rungs higher, and then put your feet on these 2 rungs and push....which directly moves you higher.....ideally, with almost no fin bending, so that it really feels like the push is against a solid object like the rungs)
Worst for the resistance, are fins like the Mustang C4 freedive fins, which have a rail on the blade edge, and do not slide back easily.
Worst for the big PUSH, are sloppy fins like Apollo bio splits, which don't feel as though there is anything at all to "push" on....
Scubapro Jetfins are stiff to the point of being a nice platform to push off of...and, they have a good control surface that allows them to be slid sideways with an articulated ankle, and have very little resistance on the way back to the start of the push phase of the frog kick.... The Excellerators are almost identical to the large jets on push, and slightly easier to articulate and slide. This ease in the sliding and articulation, is what makes them superior for the Reverse Kick....something nice to have in-cave.
Unlike the jets, the Excellerators become more efficient as more torque and higher cadence is appied in a flutter kicking scenario, when a high speed is required to deal with some critical event. The jets lose efficiency if anything, as you approach maximum speed with them.