Nothing surprising about Randy keeping low profile on it; bad for business. The article veers off into the shark feeding controversy. The more this gets publicized, the more it fuels those opposed to the practice with a sensationalist opportunity.
Thing is, this was a bite on a shark feeder, who's done who knows how many of these dives over the years, not on a customer. Unless you're considering a job as a shark feeder, it doesn't say much about risk to others.
Notice articles on this incident also tend to do a flashback to Abernathy getting bitten years ago?
Imagine if most scuba-related articles included flashbacks to drownings, severe DCS cases, disappearances, etc...? Or if every time we saw an article about a scuba-related injury or death, there was a reference to a prior one, and soap box time for someone who thinks diving is too dangerous, or interferes with sea life...
News media thrive on sensationalism (hence the old cliche 'if it bleeds, it leads').
There's no benefit for anyone in the industry turning an anecdotal tragic event into newspaper filler.
Richard.