Huh.. well I don't know what to think about it really. Given those facts it doesn't sound dangerous. If some bottles like ASTM are never tested then why are others required to be tested?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I'm sure it is going to cost a lot of lives.Maybe I'm misunderstanding. Isn't this very dangerous? Especially considering it seems to be aimed at oxygen cylinders.
If not then... maybe the testing (and especially VIP) rules really are as much BS as some folks claim.
Because ASTM vessels are built like tanks to handle a large amount of corrosion before they are even close to failing. And in some applications they are far too large to fill with water and put into another vessel for hydro testing. If you could even remove it from the installation in the first place - like the air tanks inside a submarine. You couldn't walk with a 100cf ASTM cylinder on your back (and your BC wouldn't float you either)Huh.. well I don't know what to think about it really. Given those facts it doesn't sound dangerous. If some bottles like ASTM are never tested then why are others required to be tested?
They can, but its not a legal requirement to do that in order to remain in service.ASTM vessels can be tested ultrasonically in place as an alternative to hydro