PairofMedics
Guest
ParamedicDiver1:I agree 110%...like all changes in medicine, CCC-CPR must stand up to the test before we announce sweeping changes. I know that my medical director has stated that he embraces CCC-CPR for the layperson, but has no plans to take away our advanced airway management techniques (Intubation-oral or nasal, LMA, combi-tubes, and emergency trachs). But he does like the idea of laypersons and potentially basic 1st responders doing CCC-CPR, *IF* the data holds up.
I am all for laypersons doing whatever they can to help. I've told many of my own students to pay attention to their limitations, and CCC is better than nothing...it's anaerobic metabolism, but it's a start. The big problem I have is that he's convincing actual ALS providers and services to bypass and essentially ignore airway and oxygenation before the facts are in from the field trials and the AHA has had a chance to review. You know, someone else here ridiculed me about my mentioning of the standards we must adhere to, and his interpretation of my statement was that we perform to a standard and no more than that. He's got it backwards! We must perform to a minimum standard, but are encouraged to perform at a higher level. Going the extra mile is what we're all about.