Here's a reply ArcticDiver sent to me off line and with his permission I'm posting it here as I think it gives a valid viewpoint.
Harry:
I'm happy to help. But your using the phrase "...pretty conservative.." presents a "teaching moment".
If one doesn't positively know the boundaries, how does one know if what they are doing is conservative or aggressive as compared to an alternative action? If Charlie takes longer ascending than William is he being more conservative, or just taking longer?
The answer is: We don't know. We know a lot about the basic science. But we don't know enough about the application of that science to human diving to be definitive. Experimentally we know that thousands of dives are done without incident using a broad spectrum of dive profiles. Whether one or the other is "safer", or more "conservative", or more "aggressive" we can't say.
Add to this lack of knowledge the human propensitiy to flock to fads and peoples desire to market new products and services and a very ill defined and slippery situation is the result.
I've seen, as have others, divers do profiles that according to the "authorities" should have bent or killed them; but didn't. On the other hand divers have done profiles that supposedly were right down the middle of "acceptable profiles" and been permanently crippled.
The same goes with exercise. We all have seen lots of divers dive deep decompression dives; emerge from the water and haul gear up a steep hill till they could hardly move. All with no ill effect.
So, my advise has always been to find an algorithm in a dive computer that you are comfortable with and follow its' guidance. No particular algorithm has any better proven record than any other so all should get you down and back up with acceptable risk. But, always remember the next dive may be The One. Or, you may go for the rest of your life with no problem.
Well, take care and happy diving.