Cost would not be an issue, regardless of insurance. In the US, emergency care is rendered (or should be) as dictated by the situation. Elective care is another issue.
It seems here that the symptoms were mild, the limits did not seem to be exceeded and the response to oxygen alone seemed good.
My question, again to people who are DCS experts if any are reading this thread, would be: what role does the profile have in determining use of a chamber in this situation? In extreme cases, the profile will help determining the actual treatment to be rendered in the chamber. But what about the person with DCS who comes in and says "I was within limits"...do you ask to see the profile? Does the decision to treat and/or the manner of chamber treatment depend on knowing the profile in this setting? Or is response to oxygen enough?
The best patient is an informed patient, so we should all know, expert or not, when to question a doc's decision to NOT use a chamber when the symptoms are neurological and clearly DCS. Especially in other countries where a) cost may be on the doctor's mind and b) the liability of the doctor is less clear and c) the expertise of the personnel may be unknown. What if this had happened somewhere in Mexico or Africa and the local doc says no chamber is needed?
When should a diver demand a chamber? How much dive medicine should someone know, particularly when doing repetitive deep dives?