Do Floating Objects Have 'Weight'?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

That depends on how you think of it. "Pound" is generic. Pound-force or pound-mass are more specific. I said mass, because we commonly talk about weight and weighing, and weight is mass times gravity. Of course, the ISO definition is mass times local[/] gravity, and that kind implies pound-force, if you're going to use pounds as the measure.
 
This question reminds me (if I remember correctly) of the question Charles Lindbergh asked himself while flying the Atlantic: does a (house)fly flying (as opposed to sitting) in the cockpit add weight to the aircraft? (Answer: yes.)

If the fly is flying, then it's weight can not be added to the overall weight of the plane as it is supporting it's own weight by means of lift generated from its wings. There may be some downward force generated by the fly that can cause weight fluctuations, but the static total weight will remain unchanged if the fly flys out the window.

If you have a milk jug full of water, and can convince a 1 pound weight to fly in the middle of the milk jug and not touch the sides and submerge it in water, will it weigh more or less if the flying lead weight flys out? It will weigh less, but only by the amount of water displaced by the weight, not by the weight of the weight. :-)
 
I was in the back of a truck moving flooded furniture recently, travelling
at 100 kilometres per hour, and jumped in the air and became motionless.

But you don't want to do that in a small helicopter following contours.
 
And just before the falling elevator hits the bottom wouldn't we all JUMP?:D
 
F = ma

If it has mass, and there is acceleration, then it has weight.
 
Last edited:
A plane is standing on a large treadmill or conveyor belt. The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyor moves in the opposite direction. This conveyor has a control system that tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyor to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction). Can the plane take off?

:popcorn:
 
A plane is standing on a large treadmill or conveyor belt. The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyor moves in the opposite direction. This conveyor has a control system that tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyor to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction). Can the plane take off?

:popcorn:

Faulty premise or faulty wording? If you mean that the treadmill "negates" the forward motion of the plane relative to the ground/air, then the plane is not moving, therefor there's no air rushing over it's wings. No air rushing over wings, no lift. No lift, no takeoff.

bernoulli.gif


If however you mean that the plane is still moving forward along the conveyor belt then it would be possible for the plane to gain some airspeed and therefor lift.
 
Last edited:
The plane's source of power is the prop or jets and has nothing to do with the wheels. Therefore the conveyor speed has little impact on the plane. So the plane will get up to take-off speed, but the wheels will just be turning faster.
 
Too often too much speed negates the lift.
 

Back
Top Bottom