flymolo
Contributor
If they where reliable you would not need multiple systems to make sure they are working and backing them up when they fail.
This is still true in the case where you have solid state sensors. You will still need more than one sensor and more than one monitoring source. Nothing actually changes.
What you said isn't actually true for all rebreather designs either. Some use computer logic to determine how to run the solenoid and calculate decompression in the event of a cell failure, others don't do much at all and rely on the diver to make decisions. I would imagine these different design philosophies will continue to exist once solid state sensors are used more widely.
If the cells we are using now don't work you wouldn't see as many people doing big dives on their rebreathers without incident. I don't recall any of the recent fatality reports attributing a fataility to a malfunctioning cell (or cells).