No, I haven't failed anyone for coming to class looking sloppy.
That's good to hear.
Not all bad habits can be trained out of new divers during the short open water courses that are currently the norm. However, if training is supposed to be modular, but achieve the same end, I question the value of advanced and specialty training that doesn't stop hand swimming.
And rightly so. Even at the OW level students are required to hover without skulling, as they are in several other courses requiring hovering, like PPB, drysuit and whatever. Amazingly, it would appear that many instructors do not pay any attention at all to sculling. Likewise many divers would appear to not see it as a priority so some people will certainly get in the habit of doing it. The problem is, once it's an unconscious habit, the job of getting it out again is much more difficult.
While it is true that instructor performance and teaching ability is related to student performance and ability, sometimes a student's abilities and capacity for learning would require a sizable investment in money and times. Also, not every instructor is the best for each student. Sometimes an instructor who is able to coach many students to meet standards during allotted class time simply cannot connect with one student who might learn better from another instructor's methods.
There is no question that you might be able to get through to a student I can't. By the same token, I might be able to get results from a student that you can't seem to bring up to speed. In that sense, we would fail where another would succeed. I have a guy I'm sending to my friend, Bob Sherwood, because I couldn't fix him.
I'm glad to hear you did this instead of just failing him outright. Where I work we do the exact same thing and for the same reasons (except my colleagues are not Bob Sherwood!
)
Yet, even though he has very poor skills he went to another instructor to achieve advanced nitrox and deco. He honestly is not safe at that level. He remarked that he was impressed with his instructor for controlling the buoyancy of 4 students during class. The instructor actually had to inflate or deflate wings as needed because the students lacked control, but passed them anyway.
How do you know this?
At what point do we hold a student back? Do we let a kid slip through the public school system without being able to read? Does the kid's college professor let him ride for the football scholarship? In diving, when does an instructor say you need greater control? Rather than focus on the mantra of trim, buoyancy and propulsion because these are not universally agreed upon, I thought I'd start with a universal examination of uncontrolled or crutch use of hands since they may be retarding diver skill, comfort and ability at the most elementary level.
I think the main thing that leads to the things we often complain about is that some instructors are certifying students (evidently quite a few instructors) who don't actually perform to standards. As I said before, students are supposed to be made aware of the issue of sculling with the hands and feet in their very first diving course. That's not to say they should be diving like you or like Bob Sherwood at that level but the awareness should be there.
If they become aware and subsequently don't care about it, fine. But if they never become aware of it and are allowed, as in this case, to go through a whole string of diving courses without any of the instructors saying something until they hit the wall with someone like you then there is clearly a problem.
In my opinion (just based on what I see around me) I think many instructors find it very difficult to give their students bad news and end up approving things that are marginal (or worse) because the time is up, even though the student isn't ready. The fact that none of the main stream agencies has QA to actually check if students have achieved mastery means that the instructor is approving his own work (fox guarding the hen-house) and stuff like this is able to happen.
What makes this whole thing very tricky is that training is performance based but everyone is on a schedule. I've felt for a long time that the AOW as given by most agencies would be better off if PPB were required and the deep dive was taken out. at least then divers would be forced to do at least *some* thinking about trim and buoyancy at a point early on in their diving.
SB is allowing me to see how many participants believe hand swimming is a bad habit (or not) in divers and pros and whether the desire to eliminate it is strong or not really something divers might support.
I think at the level of courses you're teaching, that students flapping around are (a) not showing sufficient control. If you have doubts about their buoyancy and trim then how can you be confident in their ability to hold stops? In a nitrox course you might make them aware and practice with it a bit, but in advanced nitrox, they need to be able to hold stops... and (b) it's a bad calling card when people see your students diving.
R..