Divemaster Responsibilities

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I just finished reading through all the threads.

Currently, I am finishing up PADI DM. It seems like half the coursework has to do with protecting the safety of other divers in some capacity or another. During the internship, I have been learning about all the crazy things that both uncertified divers and certified divers can do. I can't see the point to all that if there isn't some assumption of helping protect other divers.

On all of the caribbean dives that I have done, the DMs have provided a dive and safety briefing, supervised the group underwater, and ensured that the group got back on the boat. If this was not necessary, there would be little point to having a divemaster the in the first place other than pointing out sealife.
 
Disclaimer BS in these politicall correct times:
Please note that you is used as a general term and is not directed at any one person.

This thread is going nowhere fast. I'm off to the gym now but when I get home I will post a thread in the New Divers forum in an attempt to explain what the responsibility of the diver, the DM, the instructor, and the op is as far as concerns new divers. Fosterboxermom you are correct in that new divers need more than those of us who are more experienced but this must start in training. I hope to cover what new divers can expect from the aforementioned once they have their card. This will be difficult as there is NO UNIVERSAL STANDARD of conduct.

I like diving in the keys because they do not put a DM in the water unless you pay for it. Of course my training was not one of those 2 weekend wonder jobs. And this was at my insistence from a PADI instructor. I attended additional sessions and read up on what I was doing. I also dive as often as possible and did so from the beginning especially locally as our conditions are less than stellar and require one to keep their skills up to date. The PADI materials while well put together are rather geared towards, how shall I put this, less than college material students and do not adequately address the hazards of diving. The standards do not require instructors to drive home the fact that this sport can kill in favor of making a profit.

I do my best to address this fact in every class session. Graphically describing the effects of an embolism, the fact that the bends can have serious life altering after effects, that be back on the boat with 500psi as a dive plan is bull caca, and that exceeding your RECOMMENDED limits without training and experience is a good way to get very dead. I hope to instill in my students a genuine respect for this activity and if they have doubts, second thoughts, or are doing this for someone else that it causes them to perhaps take up another sport. I'd rather lose a paying student to golf or tennis than have their death on my conscience.

My whole philosophy behind my teaching is that if I would not want my son, daughter, wife, or other loved one to dive with a student I just certified without myself or another pro present I should not be giving them a c card. I also have no interest in producing underwater tourists. I train divers who are capable of diving independently with a buddy of equal skill in conditions equal to or better than that which they trained in. If I feel they cannot do this they don't get the card until I'm satisfied they can. Unfortunately this is not the case in the biggest part of the training industry today. I've seen instructors certify students who had no business in the water period let alone diving.

If one is unable to find your way back to the boat, shore, upline, etc without assistance the dive should not be done in the first place. DM's can get hurt, lost, be preoccupied with another diver having issues, etc. In that case you are on your own. If that is not comfortable to you stay out of the water. It is not hard to do a safe ascent, look for the boat, if needed drop your weights, inflate and wait to be picked up. If this is too stressful your training sucked, you don't dive enough, you are more of a liability as a buddy ( I'd rather dive solo), and that person is an accident waiting to happen.

In addition it is again the divers responsiblilty to gauge the situation and decide if the dive is doable and within their comfort zone. If not you speak up and call the dive or arrange for a private professional escort on the dive. I know I'll get alot of flack for this and what I plan to post but I'm just so frustrated by the number of deaths involving new divers that in most cases( medical isssues excepted) that could have been easily prevented by a little more training and common sense.
 
I also have no interest in producing underwater tourists.

I understand and respect that. However MANY, MANY divers are just that, tourists. They are "hobbyists" but not in the dedicated, hardcore way.

Should they be denied the ability to dive? Should someone spend six months of every other weekend and college level classes to get dive certified (like my pilots license)? I dunno, maybe.

These are all what-if's though. The REALITY is that we have people (myself included) that are products of the two-weekend training and want to be safe and are looking for a bit of the "elder statesman" concern from DM's and been-there-done-that divers that assist in looking out for us, making sure we stay safe.

I sincerely hope that the diving community fosters such an attitude and not one of "screw 'em, they are certified let them take care of themselves" all the while you see them heading for the abyss.
 
These are all what-if's though. The REALITY is that we have people (myself included) that are products of the two-weekend training and want to be safe and are looking for a bit of the "elder statesman" concern from DM's and been-there-done-that divers that assist in looking out for us, making sure we stay safe.

Most new divers have no idea, but by following PADI's rules, it's possible to go from "which side of the valve does the regulator go on?" to "Instructor" in less than a month.

The "elder statesman" could have been emptying the trashcans at McDonalds last month.

Terry

Edit: Sorry, I said "less than a month". It should have said "a month". There was a school advertising 30 days "zero to hero"
 
I understand and respect that. However MANY, MANY divers are just that, tourists. They are "hobbyists" but not in the dedicated, hardcore way.

Should they be denied the ability to dive? Should someone spend six months of every other weekend and college level classes to get dive certified (like my pilots license)? I dunno, maybe.

This is something any diver should look in to when booking their trip. What type of diving will you be doing? Are you looking for hand holding, are you looking for a guide or are you looking for a hands off approach.

No one should be left out but an experienced diver wont want to book a trip with a load of "resort" divers. The opposite should be true, the "resort" diver shouldn't be booking a trip they don't have the experience for.
 
There's a lot of "dead horse beating" going on here, but generally speaking you can't count on a DM for any significant level of judgement. Many are brand-new 30 (or 60) day wonders and don't have any idea of the potential problems when working with new divers, others have been working at it for too long and are oblivious to the dangers, still more are just clueless or don't give a crap.

The most important piece of equipment in SCUBA is the bull****-o-meter. It should be going off like a smoke detector when anybody suggests a 100' wall dive is appropriate for a brand new diver.

The most important skills are:

  • Saying "No."
  • Learning how to raise your middle finger, point it at the DM, surface with your buddy and return to the boat.
Terry
 
There's a lot of "dead horse beating" going on here, but generally speaking you can't count on a DM for any significant level of judgement. Many are brand-new 30 (or 60) day wonders and don't have any idea of the potential problems when working with new divers, others have been working at it for too long and are oblivious to the dangers, still more are just clueless or don't give a crap.

The most important piece of equipment in SCUBA is the bull****-o-meter. It should be going off like a smoke detector when anybody suggests a 100' wall dive is appropriate for a brand new diver.

The most important skills are:

  • Saying "No."
  • Learning how to raise your middle finger, point it at the DM, surface with your buddy and return to the boat.
Terry

So here's your problem.

As a new diver, you have ****** all idea of what's going on. Rightly or wrongly you ASSUME the person in charge is qualified, is professional, has a duty of care, etc. This may not be the standard position of SB members, but I'm fairly sure it is of the vast majority of people from whom PADI make their money (I have no knowledge of other agencies).

If DM's do not have a duty of care to new divers then this is not being correctly communicated. In fact, it's not communicated at all.

Saving a newbie from their own stupidity should be a fairly basic offering of any dive op. After 4 days of learning to dive, a DM should have enough sense - for their own career if nothing else - to keep people within their limits.

I'm really struggling to understand how this board, which frequently complains about training standards, is now more than happy to say that a newly qualified diver is totally responsible for themselves/decisions. After 4 days training a person is unlikely to be able to make these kinds of decisions and should be aided by those with more experience, the OP included.

Secondly, it is also not easy for a new person to an activity to 'say no' to a figure of authority. Mightn't be ideal, but that's how most of us are programmed.
 
Last edited:
I'm really struggling to understand how this board, which frequently complains about training standards, is now more than happy to say that a newly qualified diver is totally responsible for themselves/decisions. Can't have it both ways.

That is exactly what many are trying to say. A diver needs to have sufficient training and ability to execute a given dive regardless whether a DM is present or not. Their role is to lead dives not nursemaid incompetent divers. If you are not capable without the DM you shouldn't be there. And you should have the knowledge from your training to know the difference.
 
I'm really struggling to understand how this board, which frequently complains about training standards, is now more than happy to say that a newly qualified diver is totally responsible for themselves/decisions. Can't have it both ways.
For best results, ask this in New Divers forum before going out.

The training industry has its agenda, but in the real world - cover your own ass. Do you believe everything your car salesman teaches you about buying cars...?
 
YES, that's true.

The problem I have with all of this is that during training they NEVER tell the students that a DM is just a guide and that YOU should not rely on them. That needs to be stressed in training for your C card.

I guess it depends on the instructor cause I mention that. Can't say that I harp on it over and over though.
 

Back
Top Bottom