(...)
Bottom line, the CE markings are about commercial competition within the EU. The ever benevolent EU looking after standards, bless 'em.
(...)
Curious as to whether you have read or exmined the technical requirements to pass EN14143 before making this statement. I have read it and it is apparent from reading it that the actual standards that are required for any CCR to pass EN14143 are simply there to protect us the diver by ensuring every CCR has a safe WOB performance envelope. Every single product that has a life safety system aspect to it, from airbags to airplanes have to have some third party accreditation. THis concept is not unique, e.g. there are global standards such as ISO.
Of course the world market in rebreathers ishugetinyminiscule. The cost of certification is considerable -- many 10's of thousands and takes a many months/years. Once tested it's extremely hard to make changes without needing recertification.
Somehow the rest of the world gets by without an approval process let alone the CE approval process -- even the hyper-litigious USofA.
Now nothing against a good discussion but would prefer this topic not to turn into another pro/against Brexit, pro/against EU or why everybody hates M26 valve. Neither "my sorb is bigger than yours aka Revo wars" as in the other 20+ pages rebreather topic
Standards save lives, and while certain aspects of this standard are debatable, bottom line is, it is a law. So if it does not apply to me, eg. as non-commercial, great, but if it does (and that is what i am trying to ascertain) then that is something i need to follow, regardless whether i like it or not. Last thing i need is some 200k bill for a rescue or something because insurer will say "oopsie, but you were not following standards, kthx, bye" as boring as it sounds.