lamont
Contributor
Vayu:What can motivate a statement such as this? I really have to disagree and refuse to see DIR diving as something that needs to be preached.
When you read that, did you hear a big whooshing sound as it went over your head?
Weither or not sidemounting is worth the risk is a subjective value judgement. The point of the religion analogy is that it is subjective. DIR divers are typically a crowd of people who tend to the conclusion that there's a lot of cave out there which doesn't need sidemount.
This would imply faith and thinking divers generally don't take things on faith alone.
There is absolutely no objective way to argue about risk. Plenty of the people I work with think I'm freaking nuts to even be recreational diving. Arguing with them is as pointless as arguing about religion. You have to have a certain amount of faith about the risk that you are willing to accept. Some people are more risk averse, some are less. DIR divers tend to be the most risk averse of the aggressive divers.
There has been and will continue to be specialized types of diving that happen on the exploration end of things. You won't find me doing any of it. It requires an extreme personality to be doing true exploring and all divers doing it take extreme measures. I believe the original poster wants to find the best method of doing it and he thinks some DIR affiliated divers have that knowledge.
Which I don't really understand. I mean you find the occasional DIR type who has gone on to other stuff (e.g. chickdiver and her heretical megalodon CCR), but generally its the wrong crowd to go to if you want those answer.
Maybe they do or maybe they don't. In either case I believe it is a good thing to ask a question and a bad thing to tell divers with questions that they need to go someplace else. Our goal in this forum is to help people become safer divers and I believe a little respect is in order.
No, this is the DIR forum.
And I was being completely respectful, you just chose to completely misinterpret it.