- Messages
- 97,453
- Reaction score
- 98,519
- Location
- On the Fun Side of Trump's Wall
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
You shouldn't ... but consider that it takes even less effort to not call someone stupid, and with more positive results.JeffG:Where is the line drawn? Well, it would take very little research to "debunk" half of his questions. So, if he can't even put in a little bit of effort, Why should I (or anyone else)?
Look, I don't claim to be DIR ... but I work at a GUE shop, and I do try my best to promote the benefits of GUE to those divers who I believe want to take diving seriously.
Most of the stuff Trey splatters across cyberspace is aimed at people who should know better ... but because some think it makes good sound bites, it ends up getting used to "promote" an image of DIR that only clutters up the conversation.
Had a guy round off on me at the DUI DOG Days event yesterday simply because I made some mention of diving with DIR folks. Hell, I wasn't even talking to him ... but suddenly I got the whole friggen' sermon about how he's been diving since 1964 and dives trimix and ... yada yada yada ... and he doesn't need a bunch of people who weren't even born when he started diving coming around telling him how he's doing it all wrong ... yada yada yada.
So where do ya think he got his ideas about DIR? Probably the same place fishhunta's friends at the LDS did ... by reading a bunch of horse-hockey on the Internet.
I could've fired back yesterday, but I let the dude ramble ... and when he stopped to take a breath I said "Ya know, I dive to have fun ... how about you?"
Point is, "clever" remarks tend to convey an image that DIR would be better off without. If you think a response is worth the effort, at least make it a worthwhile response. It'll make my job of explaining to new divers why they might want to consider DIR a whole lot easier ... and give the older divers less of a reason to cop an attitude.
... Bob (Grateful Diver)