Hey SBer's,
My last two dives I spent working on DIR style kicking and found that, yes, they do reduce silt kick up significantly. I was able to reduce my silt to zero even when cruising inches from the ground.
I am curious on a few things though:
1) Why do people use the frog kick even when traversing open water well above the bottom? As a former competitive swimmer, frog kick is the most inefficient kick of all three because of the repeated fast acceleration and fast deceleration. Even the DIR style flutter kick with 90* bent knees is much more efficient.
Not just in open water but through kelp forests too. I watched as both of my experienced buddies this weekend frog kick through kelp forests and couldn't help but notice that if for instance kelp snagged on their tanks, the fast acceleration from frog kick would pull them upwards, or otherwise worsen things by pulling tighter. Whereas when I switched to DIR flutter, if something snagged, it would be gradual and I could quickly untangle without as much thrashing around as frog produces.
I can see frog kick's utility when maneuvering in smaller areas but not for longer distance travel or even cruising at depth.
2) Again, as a competitive swimmer, frog kick is really hard on the knees. Those of us who used to race the stroke can attest that long workouts of breaststroke did not leave us with happy knees. While I don't have bad knees yet, I'm expecting some in a couple of years due to rowing injuries. Does DIR actually address this or is it just a HTFU issue for them?
If you do have bad knees, how do deal with frog kick? Or do you just not do it?
In the end, I just don't see the heavy emphasis on DIR frog kick being correct or necessary. Yes, it is a kick that has uses and should be used should the situation call for it. But to use it as a primary mode of movement? It seems impractical.
There is no such thing as "DIR style kicking" as all styles and types of fin propulsion predate DIR/GUE by several decades including the use of frog kicks in caves and wrecks and other silt prone environments.
I too am a competitive swimmer and WSI and agree somewhat with your assessment and I use several combination kicks that are not even discussed in DIR including a bent knee scissor with a flutter or frog in between each cycle which allow me to cover a lot of ground with minimal exertion.
The frog kick you will do with your paddle fins will use a push with the bottom of the fin, not so much the whip effect of the swimmer's frog kick.
I would not take the flutter and the scissor off my list just because it is not "DIR Approved."
Since none of this has actually been measured, O2 uptake/heart rate vs distance/speed vs kick style we can claim efficiency or more efficiency until the cows come home, one person is not another person and I am just as efficient IMO with a flutter kick after a lifetime of lap swimming as I am at a frog kick. If you slow the flutter kick down to the same speed (distance covered) as the typical frog kick, it is IMO, more efficient and until someone actually measures this stuff, there is no fact to back up anything. I have actually done fin swimming tests with a variety of fins and used several kick styles several years ago. I would swim a mile crawl, no fins and then swim a 1/4 mile with a particular fin and kick. I repeated this over and over, always a mile swim up front to even the board, and then swim a 1/4 mile for time at a moderate effort with the various fins and kicks. The frog did not win my swim test, sorry. You can do a similar test for yourself. One thing about long distance athletes is that they have a good sense of gauging their efforts, I figure you fit into that category and can evaluate for yourself.
N