Xanthro
Guest
lamont:The DIRF test is not a test of some kind of real-life emergency simulation. It is a test of basic cardiovascular fitness and VO2 capacity. If you can't hit 50 feet in swimtrunks and no gear, you have some kind of a physical fitness issue which needs to be addressed. Period. With fins on, you should be able to go farther.
I had a hard time hitting 50 feet initially, but I got into the pool and practiced and I'm getting into better shape and I can hit 60 feet consistantly now, and I'm working on hitting 70 feet consistantly. And I suck. Start going to the pool every other day and 50 feet should get easy. Stop making excuses about how its not fair.
How did you conclude that I'm making an excuse as to how the test is not fair?
I've swam over 300 FEET before. 50 feet is nothing under the test conditions, it's pathetically easy.
Had you stopped at it's a cardiovascular and VO2 test, you'd have been fine, but when I ask what relevance the test has to diving, and I get replies that it mimics a diving condition and I point out that it does not mimic a diving condition and present a type of test that would more accurately reflect what would be expected on a dive, this does not say the test is currently too hard.
In fact, swimming 50 feet in gear with fins in a 7mm wetsuit would be nearly as hard than doing so in trunks with no gear. The former has far more drag and while fins are more efficient, in gear you lose much of the ability to glide and use your arms.