CBulla:
I am, however, enjoying watching things ya'll do and completely understand and respect the levels you've taken your diving skills to. And yes, I'm even picking up a few little things that I'm adapting into my own diving. Congrats on your accomplishments SJ
Thanks, man.
Hey, you aren't the first person to mention a "level." I've even had a few PM's about "diving at 'my' level." I even had one person say that they'd love to dive with me (my invite), but they were "afraid they didn't dive at my level."
Guys, maybe this has come across the wrong way... The accomplishment is gratifying, and I'm proud of my team (RavenC and I) for having made it... But it's not any special "level." Nearly all of our diving is still at "recreational dive depths" - in fact, looking at my logs, I think I'm averaging something like 22 feet of depth (shallow, high-current, blackwater diving is a staple here), and we're just getting into mixed gas diving... Most of what we dive is a variety of different percentages of "nitrox" - basically, from 21% (air) on up.
I don't want anyone thinking that we're somehow on a different "level" than they are... We all still dive the same waters as everyone else. Seeing individuals on different "levels" gives people excuses to *******ize their gear configurations and skills. They think, "HE might need to dive a _____ (fill in the blank with a bp/wing, drysuit, unusual breathing gas, or anything else), but *I* certainly don't need that sort of stuff... I'M ON A DIFFERENT LEVEL." They insult themselves by telling themselves things like that. It's just not fair to them - and it's not reality.
I'm often questioned about RavenC's and my gear choices... Frankly, to a non-DIR diver, that's what's most apparent to them at the dive site. We dive quite a bit with a variety of different people, our SAR team notwithstanding. There is a thought process prevalent in these groups of divers, trained by a variety of instructors with a variety of backgrounds and agencies, that gear, skills, knowledge, and other "tools" in a diver's toolbox need to change with the "kind of diving" they're doing. This is a fallacy.
Case in point: More than a few divers that we're consistently around dive the local high-current blackwater with 50 or 60 pounds of weight on, often with a tether or cord connecting a diver and his buddy. Sometimes they simply give up on good buddy skills because of the visibility (and in all fairness, shallow water) and do a "same ocean" dive - the kind of dive where there's two or more divers in the water, but they have no contact and are not
really buddied. The thought process regarding the massive weight they carry is that it "sticks" them to the bottom, where they want to be in order to dig for fossils. They tell me all the time that without the weight, they'd be swept away with the current.
Well, RavenC and I dive side-by-side with these people, always in full contact with each other, never swept downstream, and without overweighting ourselves and without a tether. And yes, we dig too.
Predictably, many of these people exit the water completely exhausted, handing their gear up piece-by-piece in hopes that someone on the boat is able to help them.
Usually, it's us who's helping them - we exited the water as a team and on time, climbing aboard in full gear, energized and excited about our finds. In some cases, it's not made us the most popular people.
...But that doesn't put us on some sort of "level." It's a false thought process that "the waters around here are different." (I hear that all the time, no matter where I am.) It's a false thought process that gear, skills and knowledge need to be different from dive to dive or location to location.
Take that with a grain of salt, though... Tropical waters deserve a 3mil wetsuit. Arctic waters deserve the right drysuit. Overhead always deserves doubles, and yes, singles are fine in 60 feet of Caribbean water.
...But the rig is still the same, no matter what exposure protection you choose, gas mix you choose, number of bottles you choose, etc. The harness is the same harness, the skills are the same skills, and the actions are the same actions. Thsi gives the DIR diver the opportunity to master the dive - because it's a repeat of last time, just with different scenery.
You wouldn't think about changing your regs "to suit THIS KIND OF DIVING," would you? I mean, you don't dive one style of reg in salt water, and another style of reg in freshwater, do you? Didn't you buy a reg that you could use in all of your diving? Didn't you buy the one that served it's purpose in all of the environments that you plan to be in? Of course you might not need the sealed reg capable of handling contaminated or cold water when you're diving in the Keys... But since you dive in the Great Lakes once a year, didn't you buy the reg that could handle it? Aren't you still going to dive that same reg everywhere you dive? The concept of "one, really nice reg for all of your diving" is a DIR thought process. Buy the best, buy it once, and use the heck out of it. Bingo - DIR Philosophy.
Why would it be any different with any other piece of gear? Why would it be any different with any dive skill that you've mastered? Doesn't that make sense?
...So I'm flattered when y'all say something about a "level," but I'm on the same level that you are. Same level, same water, same set of skills.
If you are using a skill or a piece of gear that doesn't work in certain situations, then get rid of it - there's lots of skills and lots of gear that will serve you equally well in all situations.
...Which is why they created the Fundies class in the first place... To give everyone the same instruction that will serve everyone correctly in all circumstances.
That way, you have the opportunity to master ONE set of skills - ONE set of gear - and ONE set of objectives - so that everything gets a whole lot simpler... And you can focus on what's important, because the rest has been moved over to "instinct."
...And suddenly, the focus of the dive comes off of "getting used to gear" or "finding your buddy" or "figuring out how to use this thing" or "making sure that I'm going to be safe" and gets on "exploring the wreck" or "taking in all of the reef life" or "getting that feeling of flying." You wanna talk about fun? THAT is fun!
I know that to a non-DIR diver that doesn't appear to be the case - I understand that... I was just there months ago. I still see that perspective.
But I've found that it's a fallacy. What your brain is processing when you look at a DIR diver ("He must have worked forever to have that sort of buoyancy" - "How does he remember where the long hose goes?" - "What a pain to have to watch your buddy all the time...") isn't even being processed anymore by the DIR diver - it's all automatic for him. He's thinking about the dive. He's firmly entrenched in FUN.
...And that's not a different level - at least, it shouldn't be. If you're not on the "FUN" level, you might want to look at coming over here and checking out how we dive.
Okay, getting off of my evangelical soapbox now. At least it's better than the "whine" soapbox.
