LiteHedded
Contributor
I think you have to put this in perspective. Narcosis is but one problem a diver may have to overcome. There are many, take current for example. If you had slowly built-up your current experience so that you had a few hundred current dives under your belt, I'd suspect that you would be more comfortable, even more competent to dive in conditions where another diver would be deemed to be unsafe.
Narcosis is a problem for everyone, however the depth at which it affects the reasonable safety of a diver will vary. Divers may slowly build their experience to recognize and deal with a degree of narcosis. By doing so they develop their ability to better prepared to dive deeper on air than another diver who has not has this experience.
I'm not promoting unsafe diving practices. I am saying that the most dangerous time for any diver is when they are developing their basic skill-sets. Dealing with some degree of narcosis use to be a basic skill.
I agree that a diver is best to never experience narcosis. This can be done by using the right gas for the target depth. If this gas(s) are not available however, the diver has to make an informed choice regarding safety. The only way I have increased my ability to dive deeper on air has been through experience. If the diver never gets the experience, s/he is the same as the diver who has never had to deal with current, cold water, waves, etc.
These are all hazards. In-truth, we should never enter the water if we want to be truly safe; but as we all know, we can develop skills that allow us to venture forth.
So back to your question. As I have extensive trimix and heliox experience and in no way am I trying to be macho, I have to disagree with your statement.
I would agree with that.
and I wasn't referring to you obviously
bottom line is everyone is free to make their own decisions. we're adults. I think everyone knows where I stand at this point