Hey Doug,
I don't have a problem visualizing what you're doing, but IMHO, I think you are attempting to solve problems that shouldn't exist in the first place and thereby introducing more potentially dangerous problems. I don't think it's a good idea to have things strapped to the back tanks for wreck diving because of the very real danger of entanglement and inexcessability.
I'm curious about how you go about the logistics of dives inexcess of 300'. For any substantial dive like that, I wouldn't do it without a competant support team (a couple divers) that could help out with bottles and what not. Take a look at GUE's Bitannic expedition for an idea of what they did for support and logistics
I'll tell you one thing for certain, there ain't no friggin' way I would have an o2 bottle strapped to my back tanks like you were talking about. People have croaked doing this because they get the regs confused and breath it at depth. This is a bad idea, Doug. The way I am visualizing your gear, I see it getting quite complicated which is the wrong direction for this type of diving. You have to look in the other direction and simplify your kit and streamline it.
As for the 95's for stages, I don't think this is a good idea either. Think about it, these things are -9lbs each full. I assume you're using double LP120's pumped up (-30lbs or so), you would look like a balloon underwater trying maintain neutral buoyance with 95's strapped to you. Not only would you be pushing a ton of water, you'd best hope you don't puncture your wings and/or drysuit. This isn't a good idea, Doug. Use AL tanks at the very least.
What say anyone else?
Mike