Some people computer their SAC in PSI/min rather than cubic feet per minute. This works fine if youre only using one kind of cylinder, but doesnt translate between cylinders.
Comparing an HP80 against a [fictional?] LP80 would result in a lower PSI/min for the LP80 compared against the HP80. Its not that youre consuming less gas, its that the LP has more gas per PSI.
Good example as to why you should use cubic feet / minute rather than PSI / minute.
Roak
Comparing an HP80 against a [fictional?] LP80 would result in a lower PSI/min for the LP80 compared against the HP80. Its not that youre consuming less gas, its that the LP has more gas per PSI.
Good example as to why you should use cubic feet / minute rather than PSI / minute.
Roak