Soggy
Contributor
except that statement belonged to Warthaug
I know, I was saying that YOUR statement was false, which it was. You apparently missed the humor. Let's move on. You were logging off, IIRC.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
except that statement belonged to Warthaug
Two ocean masses that have different densities will flow, the pressure differential is not the driving force.
Incorrect.
Two ocean masses that have different densities will flow, the pressure differential is not the driving force.
Incorrect.
nevermind, we were not talking about the same pressure differential.
I've educated myself quite well. How about you? You seem to parrot the one-liners you've been fed since birth...ever do any real science and question its validity?
Ahhhhh...I see what pressure you were talking about. I'm glad. I was starting to worry about you
One liners? I've read books on astrophysics, relativity, quantum electrodynamics, string theory, evolution, and a number of other topics.
Additionally, I'm married to a good Catholic girl and attend church services pretty frequently as a result of family obligation, so I'm not ignorant to Christian beliefs.
I have attended a few Catholic masses in my time but I never really figured out what was going on until much later. Of course, I also remember when Mass was said mostly in Latin and that didn't help.
Nicely said, thanks.Then tell me this. Why is it chemists, geologists, archaeologists, biologists, physicists and all these other so-called experts are so wrong about dating the age of earth.
Why is it so more likely that all these people with years in their fields and peer reviewed work are so wrong but you are right with your self-education? Doesn't that seem suspicious to you? Doesn't some synapse in your brain wonder how almost the entire learned scientific community could get it wrong but only people who have never done true scientific work in the field can get it right?
I am dubious of the claim that anyone could be self-educated extremely well and not understand how accurate all the various dating methods are when used in combination. This is a self-discrediting revelation.
Disclaimer: I was raised in a fundamentalist household and taught all the popular myths like how there was missing link, how Darwin death bed recanted, how dating methods aren't reliable, and so forth. But having a fundamentalist preacher teach you about evolution is like having an Amish guy teach about fundamentals of computer circuit design. They are out of their league and completely ignorant of the subject only knowing hearsay about it themselves. I became suspicious of what was going on when I figured out most of what I had been told about evolution were misinformation.
If you really want to self-educate, spend some time reading the archive at TalkOrigins and catch up on current science.
"Back off, man. I'm a scientist." Dr. Peter Venkman.I've educated myself quite well. How about you? You seem to parrot the one-liners you've been fed since birth...ever do any real science and question its validity?