Creation vs. Evolution

[MikeFerrara]

And you base this conclusion on what?



Typical flawed creationist 'arguments'.

'The simplest life is far more complex to have arisen naturally'. Self-replicators can be incredibly simple, simple enough to form via pre biotic chemistry. Self-replication sets the stage for evolution to begin. Any modern life is far more complex than the early beginnings of life.

Creationists always love to talk about the 'odds'. It is obvious you don't know a thing about statistics.

Gee and I thought one of you would have just pointed out that abiogenesis was a seperate study from evolution and let it go at that. LOL

In any case, no one has yet made dead stuff into live stuff...except God, of course.

 

[gary-ramey]

And you base this conclusion on what?



Typical flawed creationist 'arguments'.

'The simplest life is far more complex to have arisen naturally'. Self-replicators can be incredibly simple, simple enough to form via pre biotic chemistry. Self-replication sets the stage for evolution to begin. Any modern life is far more complex than the early beginnings of life.

Creationists always love to talk about the 'odds'. It is obvious you don't know a thing about statistics.

When you're able to create life without extacting cells from a living organism, come talk to me.

Yes but an amoeba is made up of at least a 1000 complex protein molecules. I didn't realize a single molecule has the power to self-replicate.

 

[sheck33]

No they're not.

Yes they are, you don't have a clue about physics or any other natural science do you

 

[coachpill]

Wouldn't this be an example of adaptation of a species?

Yes. Go ahead and call it natural selection. There is nothing wrong with the term.

 

[MikeFerrara]

I think I addressed the problem we have in competing venues with sources. The internet is the world's largest he-said, she-said reference. Where could Christianity publish that would satisfy the evolutionist as reputable. Answer: no where.

How does that work? One would have to be a member of a scientific organization and publish in one of their journals?

What defines a "reputable" organization or journal?

 

[sheck33]

Do you have children?

Gravity is man made...wow enlighten me would you?

One, what does it matter whether I have children or not. The notion that everyone is sinful by nature is preposterous.

Secondly, you might try and actually READ my post. I said that the law of gravity or any other physical laws for that matter are man made. Do you even know what a physical law is?

 

[sheck33]

Volcanic activity on the moons of jupiter is relevant. It means our known universe is younger than thought.

Care to explain that one?

 

[MikeFerrara]

Yes they are, you don't have a clue about physics or any other natural science do you

Sure I do but what does that have to do with what I said?

 

[gary-ramey]

Evolution theory does not cover the origins of life. You have been so brainwashed you don't even know what it is you are bashing.

That's a new take and certainly not a belief that widely held, even amongst evolutionists. Evolution spawned from origin of the species. Science has taken that "theory" and redefined it so many times its hard to pin down exactly what they're saying anymore.

 

[sheck33]

According to the Bible, all people, children or adults, are born with sinful natures...they will sin, and cannot achieve salvation on their own.

The Bible does not teach, anywhere, the damnation of babies.

The Bible does teach that those sent to Hell are judged based upon their sins. Babies have no record to speak of, therefore they cannot be damned to Hell...Babies go to heaven.

Thanks!

The bible as the ultimate source of 'dependable' information. Sure. The bible says so, so therefore it must be true.