Some other thoughts based on reading over these (and other) forums:
I see people talk about the fact that if you can grab any "loose material" on the wetsuit, it's too large. Does this include the situation I talked about above, i.e. pointing my arms in front of me? When I do this with the M, I can definitely grab some "loose material" in front of my shoulder areas. With the S, I only get relatively negligible folds in the same area, meaning that the suit is much more like a "second skin."
I should also note that the S is no harder to get in and out of. I'm not sure if this means much given that it's a 3mm shorty (i.e. it's easy to get in and out of in general), but I saw reports that mentioned that if a suit is too small, it's more difficult to get in and out of, which is not the case with the S in my situation.
Finally, I've heard people recommend that with the hyperstretch (especially the thinner ones), you should get one or even TWO sizes smaller than what the Henderson chart says. Given this, it might be helpful to note the following:
- My chest is just a tad bigger than the M, and at the low end of the L.
- My waist is pretty much in the middle of the M (maybe towards the low end), and an inch narrower than the low end of the L.
- My weight varies a bit, going from 5 to 10lbs over the M, to the low end of the L.
- My height is at the top end of the L, and an inch over the top end of the M.
Overall, my measurements appear to roughly put me in between the M and L sizes on the chart, with my chest and weight being at the low end of L, and my waist being squarely in the M. My assumption is to put less emphasis on the height since it's a shorty, which means that the arm and leg length don't matter. This would mean that if I went by the "one size smaller" rule for a hyperstretch, a "size smaller" could put me in between the S and M sizes -- i.e. an M would be a roughly half size small, while an S would be 1 1/2 sizes small.
Does 1 1/2 sizes smaller than the chart make sense for a 3mm Hyperstretch shorty?
Once again, thanks for the feedback,
Larry