More than happy to be "challanged" - the AOW course I saw would not even come close. Taylored for those just certified that wanted to advance. Good idea, but that course would have added nothing to my skill set, and more importantly was going to interfere with some terrific diving that I just travelled 8,000 miles or so to get to.
A somewhat taylored course is what I will be shopping for once I finish Nitrox and drysuit this weekend. Will give me a chance to try another shop's drysuits and test drive another instructor. (The shop I am doing the drysuit course only has one type of drysuit so I want to try others before buying, and I am thinking that the AOW course might be the way to do it.)
Mike: Can't say I have the level of experience your student had, but am well over 100 dives, I never counted so simply have no idea - 30 plus just in the last couple of years in warm water, only on holidays. However none of them logged. When I certified, logging dives just was not considered particularly important so I never did. Nor did anyone I went diving with - just was not an issue. Normally I can talk my way around this, but once in a while I run into someone that can't be pursuaded that it is the diving that is important - not the log.
I do understand that it is entirely possible that someone will come in to your shop with a line of bull - will always cheerfully do a checkout dive if someone wants to verify my skills, and if needs be will pay for it. I understand that an instructor would not want a diver without the requisite skills on a dive or course.
I am wondering when the concept of "logged dives" became the measuring stick. In 1978 it was only a suggestion not a requirement and nothing in particular depended on having done X logged dives, as I recall anyway.