Here's the scenario.
- You live in a small city (population around 100 000).
- You want to encourage local LDSs
- There is only one LDS, where the service is at most average
- A new LDS opens
- the old LDS reacts to the new competition and the service becomes better than average. But he's really POed every time he learns an old customer visit the new store. He tells you openly that his goal is to force the other one to close and cuts the prices down.
Now, would you:
stick with the first LDS, he was there first
Go with the new one
go to both LDS alternatively (to keep the new competition in town)
go to both depending on the prices
you can vote in general but opinions on the specific scenario are more than welcomed
- You live in a small city (population around 100 000).
- You want to encourage local LDSs
- There is only one LDS, where the service is at most average
- A new LDS opens
- the old LDS reacts to the new competition and the service becomes better than average. But he's really POed every time he learns an old customer visit the new store. He tells you openly that his goal is to force the other one to close and cuts the prices down.
Now, would you:
stick with the first LDS, he was there first
Go with the new one
go to both LDS alternatively (to keep the new competition in town)
go to both depending on the prices
you can vote in general but opinions on the specific scenario are more than welcomed
