to each their ownI'm going to respectfully disagree. Biodiversity and currents are location dependent, not temperature dependent.

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
to each their ownI'm going to respectfully disagree. Biodiversity and currents are location dependent, not temperature dependent.
Perhaps so, but I will not return to Cozumel, Galapagos, or Fiji because of the currents.I'm going to respectfully disagree. Biodiversity and currents are location dependent, not temperature dependent.
to each their own![]()
I had 60' at Arena Rock once, actually several times. It's an offshore pinnacle that probably one if the most exciting dives in California.There may be lots of biodiversity in cold water -- but I can only see whats within 20 ft of me (on a good day).
I like diving in cold water, buts its really nice to be able to clearly see all the fish up to 40 feet away.
I used to believe that warm water diving was always more thrilling, but on a recent vacation to https://orlandovacation.com , I discovered some of Florida's freshwater springs, crystal-clear water, creepy tunnels, and a very different vibe than tropical reefs. It felt quite unusual and otherworldly, much like cold water diving. There is something about those less 'traditional' diving places that makes the experience even more remarkable.I prefer cold water to warm. I've even taken lots of vacations to cold water diving. I've found warm water diving to be somewhat boring, or annoying because of currents.