O2BBubbleFree
Contributor
A couple of years ago I read an article arguing that over-the-shoulder counterlungs (CLs) were preferred, because in the most common diving attitude (face-down) the CLs are in the same plane as your lungs, thus reducing the work of breathing (WOB). Makes sense to me; if your CLs are either a few inches deeper or a few inches shallower than your lungs, WOB will be increased.
However, most modern RBs seem to have gone with rear-mounted CLs. In that case your lungs and the CLs are in the same plane when horizontal and facing to the side, or when vertical. These two attitudes would be in the minority, especially using horizontal ascents and descents.
As far as I can determine, there are two advantages to rear-mounting:
1. They are enclosed, so better protected. Wouldnt want one to get punctured, would we?
2. It also seems to me that rear-mounting would get the CLs out of the divers way, but Im not sure that over-the-shoulder CLs would be all that inconvenient.
So, the question as I see it is:
Do the advantages of rear-mounting outweigh the increased WOB?
BTW, I also remember reading that a certain WWII-era military O2 RB (sorry, I dont remember the model) had some sort of mechanical device to compensate for the pressure difference between the lungs and the CL. Do modern RBs with rear-mounted CLs have some sort of device that compensates for the increased WOB? I havent put much thought into it, but it seems to me any simple device that could reduce WOB on the inhale side would increase it on the exhale side, and vice versa.
Seems to me that the optimum layout would have lungs, CLs, and diluent regulator (if used) all in the same horizontal plane during the majority of diving.
Thanks in advance for all the input. Im not yet a RB diver, just trying to learn all I can while scavenging pennies.
However, most modern RBs seem to have gone with rear-mounted CLs. In that case your lungs and the CLs are in the same plane when horizontal and facing to the side, or when vertical. These two attitudes would be in the minority, especially using horizontal ascents and descents.
As far as I can determine, there are two advantages to rear-mounting:
1. They are enclosed, so better protected. Wouldnt want one to get punctured, would we?
2. It also seems to me that rear-mounting would get the CLs out of the divers way, but Im not sure that over-the-shoulder CLs would be all that inconvenient.
So, the question as I see it is:
Do the advantages of rear-mounting outweigh the increased WOB?
BTW, I also remember reading that a certain WWII-era military O2 RB (sorry, I dont remember the model) had some sort of mechanical device to compensate for the pressure difference between the lungs and the CL. Do modern RBs with rear-mounted CLs have some sort of device that compensates for the increased WOB? I havent put much thought into it, but it seems to me any simple device that could reduce WOB on the inhale side would increase it on the exhale side, and vice versa.
Seems to me that the optimum layout would have lungs, CLs, and diluent regulator (if used) all in the same horizontal plane during the majority of diving.
Thanks in advance for all the input. Im not yet a RB diver, just trying to learn all I can while scavenging pennies.