ucfdiver
Contributor
On the other hand, I'm 53 years old and I've had a neck surgery and knee arthritis. A set of steel doubles, plus 2 AL 40s, is a large load t be lifting up a ladder or waddling around a pitching deck. I'm trying to convince the spousal unit that I need a rebreather to keep me from suffering. Yes, more demanding to fly. Yes, they require more attention to detail. But then again, so does flying IFR or mountaineering.
The fact that people die doing things is not necessarily damning to the thing being done. Sometimes, the risk is worth it if one is fully informed.
Rebreathers won't really help there. HP100's weigh in similar to CCR, and will require the same deco gas as well as bottom gas to efficiently bail out. All the CCR really saves you is on dives where more than one bottom stages will be used. That's not a whole lot of dives outside of a cave or above 200ft.
Not really. I've been further back in Ginnie Springs than the last CCR fatality there, I've been deeper than 175 and further into an overhead at the time than the Oriskany fatality, been well beyond the Jackson Blue CCR cave fatality, been as far into Eagles Nest as the CCR fatality there...all on OC.Something that also has to be taken into account is the fact that rebreather divers are doing more in the way of extreme dives.
I won't say CCR doesn't have it's place-- for cave exploration where bailout can be staged and reused it's a huge help. For photography where you can get closer to wildlife, or use equal bailout to do a 30min or 2 hour dive, it's useful. For expedition dives where helium fill stations aren't easily accessible it's useful. For extreme cold water dives where the warmth can make deco safer it's useful. ........it's just for 99% of dives done for recreational purposes that it stands zero real benefit (maybe $100 in breathing gas) and adds a huge risk.