...
The Triton would be one of the exceptions of units I would not recommend for your application as it is not easy to field repair or get spare parts... the Monox secondary computer. So much so that I had the entire Monox system ripped off and put on a second hardwired in Petrel. Also the ADV was the worst to get parts for, its actually based off of a Beuchat second stage (French...) so I threw that chunk of garbage away and put on a custom Apeks xtx50 adv. Lastly also had to make some modifications to the MAV and gas lines to allow for offboard to be plugged in.
But that being said I really like the unit now with my modifications and it is amazing as a BO unit but it is a very very specific unit for a very very specific type of diving.
Marsh9077, Can you elaborate on the details of the Apeks ADV and gas lines for offboard O2?
Despite being a new owner of a Triton CCR I fully agree with your decision to rip off the monox, would you consider a Petrel + NERD with 4 pin AK connections to be on par with hardwired in? (In the interest of easy future upgrades and ability to swap out either computer if needed without going through ordeal of dealing with the potting a second time?)
As a very new CCR owner, what I don't know vastly surpasses what I know on the Triton, let alone mere armchair research on all the other CCRs out there.. With that disclaimer given, there were a couple unique elements of my reasoning (including as relates to being a sailor planning to dive from my boat in remote locations) which lead to purchasing the Triton.
1) Weight on my boat matters a lot, which personally pushed me away from considering some of the larger / heavier rebreathers, but in the interest of maximizing potential for longer deeper dives in the future I also liked developing the most experience on a unit which could serve as a bailout rebreather if "someday" I were to want or need to do longer deeper technical diving beyond the Triton's capabilities.
2) Purely personal preference/thinking I really liked the chest mount CCR option being very visible as opposed to behind my back.
3) Philosophically mCCR appealed to me over eCCR, but I also strongly considered a Choptima.
I absolutely love how logically and easily the Triton goes together and also appreciate it's size/weight, WOB, use of POM-C vs metal where possible, and a number of other things.
4) In making my decision I viewed the Triton being a manual CCR that is CE approved to 100 meters on trimix as a really big selling point, even though I didn't require a CE unit. In learning more about CE process, I feel I overweighted that consideration.
So overall, if I had it to do over again I would buy the Triton again, but I would have absolutely insisted M3S install a Petrel + NERD for electronics instead of the stock monox+ stock HUD (due to: short battery life, one battery is for both monox and HUD, the charging port for the monox battery is not sealed from the monox electronics, and the monox doesn't provide ANY additional critical information like decompression obligations which is obviously directly tied to PPO2 measurements, etc). Taking the monox out of the equation, the Triton is awesome in my very limited experience but I would recommend stocking up on parts because getting the unit and parts from France to USA hasn't yet been perfected.